ArticleBMC biotechnology2020
Integration, abundance, and transmission of mutations and transgenes in a series of CRISPR/Cas9 soybean lines.
Article in BMC biotechnology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.
- Developmental regulators enable rapid and efficient soybean transformation and CRISPR-mediated genome editing.Plant physiology · 2026Article
- Development of novel transgene-free high-oleic peanuts through CRISPR-Cas9-mediated gene editing of two AhFAD2 homologues.Plant biotechnology journal · 2025Article
- CRISPR/Cas genome editing in soybean: challenges and new insights to overcome existing bottlenecks.Journal of advanced research · 2025Review
- CRISPR/Cas9-mediated inactivation of the soybean agglutininFrontiers in plant science · 2025Article
- Article
- A perspective from the EU: unintended genetic changes in plants caused by NGT-their relevance for a comprehensive molecular characterisation and risk assessment.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023Review
- Efficient gene targeting in soybean using Ochrobactrum haywardense-mediated delivery of a marker-free donor template.Plant physiology · 2022Article
- Genetic Dissection of CRISPR-Cas9 Mediated Inheritance of Independently Targeted Alleles in TobaccoInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- An efficient and specific CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing system targeting soybean phytoene desaturase genes.BMC biotechnology · 2022Article
- The Generic Risks and the Potential of SDN-1 Applications in Crop Plants.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- CRISPR/Cas9-Based Gene Editing Using Egg Cell-Specific Promoters in Arabidopsis and Soybean.Frontiers in plant science · 2020Article
- Progresses, Challenges, and Prospects of Genome Editing in Soybean (Frontiers in plant science · 2020Review
- Similar Seed Composition Phenotypes Are Observed From CRISPR-Generated In-Frame and Knockout Alleles of a SoybeanFrontiers in plant science · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAs with many plant species, current genome editing strategies in soybean are initiated by stably transforming a gene that encodes an engineered nuclease into the genome. Expression of the transgene results in a double-stranded break and repair at the targeted locus, oftentimes resulting in mutation(s) at the intended site. As soybean is a self-pollinating species with 20 chromosome pairs, the transgene(s) in the T0 plant are generally expected to be unlinked to the targeted mutation(s), and the transgene(s)/mutation(s) should independently assort into the T1 generation, resulting in Mendellian combinations of transgene presence/absence and allelic states within the segregating family. This prediction, however, is not always consistent with observed results.
resultsIn this study, we investigated inheritance patterns among three different CRISPR/Cas9 transgenes and their respective induced mutations in segregating soybean families. Next-generation resequencing of four T0 plants and four T1 progeny plants, followed by broader assessments of the segregating families, revealed both expected and unexpected patterns of inheritance among the different lineages. These unexpected patterns included: (1) A family in which T0 transgenes and mutations were not transmitted to progeny; (2) A family with four unlinked transgene insertions, including two respectively located at paralogous CRISPR target break sites; (3) A family in which mutations were observed and transmitted, but without evidence of transgene integration nor transmission.
conclusionsGenome resequencing provides high-resolution of transgene integration structures and gene editing events. Segregation patterns of these events can be complicated by several potential mechanisms. This includes, but is not limited to, plant chimeras, multiple unlinked transgene integrations, editing of intended and paralogous targets, linkage between the transgene integration and target site, and transient expression of the editing reagents without transgene integration into the host genome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.