ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2020
Acoustic Indoor Localization Augmentation by Self-Calibration and Machine Learning.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Indoor Localization Methods for Smartphones with Multi-Source Sensors Fusion: Tasks, Challenges, Strategies, and Perspectives.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- A Lightweight Localization Strategy for LiDAR-Guided Autonomous Robots with Artificial Landmarks.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Comparison of Direct Intersection and Sonogram Methods for Acoustic Indoor Localization of Persons.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- A Robust Steered Response Power Localization Method for Wireless Acoustic Sensor Networks in an Outdoor Environment.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
An acoustic transmitter can be located by having multiple static microphones. These microphones are synchronized and measure the time differences of arrival (TDoA). Usually, the positions of the microphones are assumed to be known in advance. However, in practice, this means they have to be manually measured, which is a cumbersome job and is prone to errors. In this paper, we present two novel approaches which do not require manual measurement of the receiver positions. The first method uses an inertial measurement unit (IMU), in addition to the acoustic transmitter, to estimate the positions of the receivers. By using an IMU as an additional source of information, the non-convex optimizers are less likely to fall into local minima. Consequently, the success rate is increased and measurements with large errors have less influence on the final estimation. The second method we present in this paper consists of using machine learning to learn the TDoA signatures of certain regions of the localization area. By doing this, the target can be located without knowing where the microphones are and whether the received signals are in line-of-sight or not. We use an artificial neural network and random forest classification for this purpose.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.