ArticleMicromachines2020
Microfluidic-Based Biosensor for Blood Viscosity and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate Using Disposable Fluid Delivery System.
Article in Micromachines, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Microfluidic Method for Simultaneous Assessment of Blood Viscosity and Red Blood Cell Aggregation During Continuous Syringe Delivery.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Micro Blood Flow-Resolved Rheometry.Micromachines · 2026Article
- Quantification of Blood Viscoelasticity under Microcapillary Blood Flow.Micromachines · 2023Article
- Biomechanical Assessment of Red Blood Cells in Pulsatile Blood Flows.Micromachines · 2023Article
- Advances in Microfluidics for Single Red Blood Cell Analysis.Biosensors · 2023Review
- Biosensing of Haemorheological Properties Using Microblood Flow Manipulation and Quantification.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Microfluidic Systems for Blood and Blood Cell Characterization.Biosensors · 2022Review
- Article
- Contributions of Red Blood Cell Sedimentation in a Driving Syringe to Blood Flow in Capillary Channels.Micromachines · 2022Article
- Assessment of Blood Biophysical Properties Using Pressure Sensing with Micropump and Microfluidic Comparator.Micromachines · 2022Article
- Editorial for the Special Issue on Micro/Nano Devices for Blood Analysis, Volume II.Micromachines · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
To quantify the variation of red blood cells (RBCs) or plasma proteins in blood samples effectively, it is necessary to measure blood viscosity and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) simultaneously. Conventional microfluidic measurement methods require two syringe pumps to control flow rates of both fluids. In this study, instead of two syringe pumps, two air-compressed syringes (ACSs) are newly adopted for delivering blood samples and reference fluid into a T-shaped microfluidic channel. Under fluid delivery with two ACS, the flow rate of each fluid is not specified over time. To obtain velocity fields of reference fluid consistently, RBCs suspended in 40% glycerin solution (hematocrit = 7%) as the reference fluid is newly selected for avoiding RBCs sedimentation in ACS. A calibration curve is obtained by evaluating the relationship between averaged velocity obtained with micro-particle image velocimetry (μPIV) and flow rate of a syringe pump with respect to blood samples and reference fluid. By installing the ACSs horizontally, ESR is obtained by monitoring the image intensity of the blood sample. The averaged velocities of the blood sample and reference fluid (<
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.