Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32093245›Full record

ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2020

Insights into the Identification of the Specific Spoilage Organisms in Chicken Meat.

Cinthia E Saenz-García, Pilar Castañeda-Serrano, Edmundo M Mercado Silva, Christine Z Alvarado, Gerardo M Nava

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. A Comprehensive Evaluation ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Cinthia E Saenz-GarcíaDepartamento de Investigación y Posgrado de Alimentos, Universidad Autónoma de Querétaro, Querétaro 76010, QRO, Mexico.
Pilar Castañeda-SerranoFacultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Tláhuac 13300, CDMX, Mexico.
Edmundo M Mercado SilvaDepartamento de Investigación y Posgrado de Alimentos, Universidad Autónoma de Querétaro, Querétaro 76010, QRO, Mexico.
Christine Z AlvaradoDepartment of Poultry Science, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA.
Gerardo M NavaDepartamento de Investigación y Posgrado de Alimentos, Universidad Autónoma de Querétaro, Querétaro 76010, QRO, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0003-4689-0419

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Poultry meat deterioration is caused by environmental conditions, as well as proliferation of different bacterial groups, and their interactions. It has been proposed that meat spoilage involves two bacterial groups: one group that initiates the deterioration process, known as specific spoilage organisms (SSOs), and the other known as spoilage associated organisms (SAOs) which represents all bacteria groups recovered from meat samples before, during, and after the spoilage process. Numerous studies have characterized the diversity of chicken meat SAOs; nonetheless, the identification of the SSOs remains a long-standing question. Based on recent genomic studies, it is suggested that the SSOs should possess an extensive genome size to survive and proliferate in raw meat, a cold, complex, and hostile environment. To evaluate this hypothesis, we performed comparative genomic analyses in members of the meat microbiota to identify microorganisms with extensive genome size and ability to cause chicken meat spoilage. Our studies show that members of the

Indexed as

chickengenomicmeat spoilagePseudomonadaceaespecific spoilage organisms

Identifiers

PMID32093245
PMCPMC7073905

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.