Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32093203›Full record

SynthesisNutrients2020

A Systematic Review of the Effect of Dietary Supplements on Cognitive Performance in Healthy Young Adults and Military Personnel.

Diane E Pomeroy, Katie L Tooley, Bianka Probert, Alexandra Wilson, Eva Kemps

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Nutrients, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. International society of sports nutrition position stand: tactical athlete nutrition.Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition · 2022
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. The Psychonauts' World of Cognitive Enhancers.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Diane E PomeroyCognition and Behaviour, Land Division (Edinburgh), Defence Science & Technology, Department of Defence, Edinburgh, South Australia 5111, Australia.
Katie L TooleyCognition and Behaviour, Land Division (Edinburgh), Defence Science & Technology, Department of Defence, Edinburgh, South Australia 5111, Australia.
Bianka ProbertFood and Nutrition, Land Division (Scottsdale), Defence Science & Technology, Department of Defence, Scottsdale, Tasmania 7260, Australia.
Alexandra WilsonSchool of Psychology, Flinders University, Bedford Park, South Australia 5042, Australia.
Eva KempsSchool of Psychology, Flinders University, Bedford Park, South Australia 5042, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0161-2960

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intake of dietary supplements has increased, despite evidence that some of these have adverse side effects and uncertainty about their effectiveness. This systematic review examined the evidence for the cognitive benefits of a wide range of dietary supplements in healthy young adult samples; the aim was to identify if any might be useful for optimising cognitive performance during deployment in military personnel. Searches were conducted in 9 databases and 13 grey literature repositories for relevant studies published between January 2000 and June 2017. Eligible studies recruited healthy young adults (18-35 years), administered a legal dietary supplement, included a comparison control group, and assessed cognitive outcome(s). Thirty-seven of 394 identified studies met inclusion criteria and were included for synthesis. Most research was deemed of low quality (72.97%; SIGN50 guidelines), highlighting the need for sound empirical research in this area. Nonetheless, we suggest that tyrosine or caffeine could be used in healthy young adults in a military context to enhance cognitive performance when personnel are sleep-deprived. Caffeine also has the potential benefit of improving vigilance and attention during sustained operations offering little opportunity for sleep. Inconsistent findings and methodological limitations preclude firm recommendations about the use of other specific dietary supplements.

Indexed as

Dietary SupplementsAdultCaffeineCognitionFemaleHealthy VolunteersHumansMaleMilitary PersonnelWorkYoung AdultCaffeinecognitioncognitive performance enhancementdietary supplementshealthy young adultsmilitary

Identifiers

PMID32093203
PMCPMC7071459

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.