Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32092914›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2020

Mobile Phone Use in a Car-Following Situation: Impact on Time Headway and Effectiveness of Driver's Rear-End Risk Compensation Behavior via a Driving Simulator Study.

Yunxing Chen, Rui Fu, Qingjin Xu, Wei Yuan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Texting While Driving: A Literature Review on Driving Simulator Studies.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Talking on the Phone While Driving: A Literature Review on Driving Simulator Studies.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Review
  5. Computer-Aided Detection False Positives in Colonoscopy.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yunxing ChenSchool of Automobile, Chang'an University, Xi'an 710064, China.
Rui FuSchool of Automobile, Chang'an University, Xi'an 710064, China.
Qingjin XuSchool of Automobile, Chang'an University, Xi'an 710064, China.
Wei YuanSchool of Automobile, Chang'an University, Xi'an 710064, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mobile phone use while driving has become one of the leading causes of traffic accidents and poses a significant threat to public health. This study investigated the impact of speech-based texting and handheld texting (two difficulty levels in each task) on car-following performance in terms of time headway and collision avoidance capability; and further examined the relationship between time headway increase strategy and the corresponding accident frequency. Fifty-three participants completed the car-following experiment in a driving simulator. A Generalized Estimating Equation method was applied to develop the linear regression model for time headway and the binary logistic regression model for accident probability. The results of the model for time headway indicated that drivers adopted compensation behavior to offset the increased workload by increasing their time headway by 0.41 and 0.59 s while conducting speech-based texting and handheld texting, respectively. The model results for the rear-end accident probability showed that the accident probability increased by 2.34 and 3.56 times, respectively, during the use of speech-based texting and handheld texting tasks. Additionally, the greater the deceleration of the lead vehicle, the higher the probability of a rear-end accident. Further, the relationship between time headway increase patterns and the corresponding accident frequencies showed that all drivers' compensation behaviors were different, and only a few drivers increased their time headway by 60% or more, which could completely offset the increased accident risk associated with mobile phone distraction. The findings provide a theoretical reference for the formulation of traffic regulations related to mobile phone use, driver safety education programs, and road safety public awareness campaigns. Moreover, the developed accident risk models may contribute to the development of a driving safety warning system.

Indexed as

Accidents, TrafficAutomobile DrivingCell PhoneCell Phone UseAdultAutomobilesFemaleHumansMaleRisk-TakingSpeech Recognition SoftwareTask Performance and AnalysisYoung Adultcompensation behaviordistractionhandheld textingrear-end accident probabilityspeech-based textingtime headway

Identifiers

PMID32092914
PMCPMC7068547

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.