Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32092913›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2020

Socioeconomic Disparities in Cancer Treatment, Service Utilization and Catastrophic Health Expenditure in China: A Cross-Sectional Analysis.

Yang Zhao, Lin Zhang, Yu Fu, Minyu Wang, Luwen Zhang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Interdependence, marginalisation, and self-acceptance: lived experiences of cancer patients in rural China.International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Yang ZhaoMelbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria 3010, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6011-5948
Lin ZhangCentre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria 3010, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2064-8440
Yu FuMelbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria 3010, Australia.
Minyu WangCancer Immunology Program, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria 3000 Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1051-5855
Luwen ZhangSchool of Health Services Management, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 500000, Guangdong, China.
The University of Melbourne · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study aims (1) to assess socioeconomic disparities in healthcare use and catastrophic health expenditure (CHE) among cancer patients in China, which is defined as the point at which annual household health payments exceeded 40% of non-food household consumption expenditure, and (2) to examine the association of different treatments for cancers with health service utilization and CHE.

methodsWe used nationally representative data from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study in 2015 with 17,018 participants in which 381 with doctor-diagnosed cancer. The main treatments for cancer included the Chinese traditional medicine (TCM), western modern medicine (refers to taking western modern medications excluding TCM and other treatments for cancers), surgery, and radiation/chemotherapy. Concentration curve was used to assess economic-related disparities in healthcare and CHE. Multivariate regression models were used to examine the impact of the cancer treatment on health service use and incidence of CHE.

resultsThe main cancer treatments and health service use were more concentrated among the rich patients than among the poor patients in 2015. There was a positive association between the treatment of cancer and outpatient visit (Adjusted Odds Ratio (AOR) = 2.492, 95% CI = 1.506, 4.125), inpatient visit (AOR = 1.817, 95% CI = 1.098, 3.007), as well as CHE (AOR = 2.744, 95% CI = 1.578, 4.772). All cancer therapies except for medication treatments were associated with a higher incidence of CHE, particularly the surgery therapy (AOR = 6.05, 95% CI = 3.393, 27.866) in urban areas.

conclusionDisparities in treatment and health service utilization among Chinese cancer patients was largely determined by financial capability. The current insurance schemes are insufficient to address these disparities. A comprehensive health insurance policy of expanding the current benefits packages and strengthening the Public Medical Assistance System, are essential for Chinese adults with cancer.

Indexed as

Catastrophic IllnessFamily CharacteristicsHealth ExpendituresNeoplasmsSocioeconomic FactorsChinaCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansInsurance, HealthLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle Agedcancer treatmentcatastrophic health expenditureChinafinancial burdensocioeconomic disparities

Identifiers

PMID32092913
PMCPMC7068279
OpenAlexW3008731238

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.