Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32092906›Full record

ReviewBiomolecules2020

NAD

Trevor Croft, Padmaja Venkatakrishnan, Su-Ju Lin

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biomolecules, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. NADCells · 2025
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Dysfunctional copper homeostasis inRedox biochemistry and chemistry · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. NADAntioxidants & redox signaling · 2023
    Review
  18. Article
  19. The Histone Deacetylases Hst1 and Rpd3 Integrate De Novo NADInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Trevor CroftDepartment of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, College of Biological Sciences, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Padmaja VenkatakrishnanDepartment of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, College of Biological Sciences, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Su-Ju LinDepartment of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, College of Biological Sciences, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
University of California, Davis · US

Funding

Understanding the Regulation of NAD+Homeostasis and SignalingR01GM102297 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI LIN, SU-JU · 2012 to 2019
$2.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM102297
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD

Indexed as

AnimalsFungal ProteinsHomeostasisHumansNADNADPNeoplasmsOxidation-ReductionSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsSignal TransductionYeastsFungal ProteinsNADNADPSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsNAD+ metabolismnutrient signalingSir2 family

Identifiers

PMID32092906
PMCPMC7072712
OpenAlexW3008283841

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.