Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32092894›Full record

ArticleGenes2020

Repetitive DNA Restructuring Across Multiple

Steven Dodsworth, Maïté S Guignard, Oscar A Pérez-Escobar, Monika Struebig, Mark W Chase, Andrew R Leitch

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genes, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. A temporal gradient of cytonuclear coordination of chaperonins and chaperones during RuBisCo biogenesis in allopolyploid plants.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Steven DodsworthSchool of Life Sciences, University of Bedfordshire, Luton LU1 3JU, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6531-3540
Maïté S GuignardSchool of Biological and Chemical Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, London E1 4NS, UK.
Oscar A Pérez-EscobarRoyal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond TW9 3AB, UK.
Monika StruebigSchool of Biological and Chemical Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, London E1 4NS, UK.
Mark W ChaseRoyal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond TW9 3AB, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9927-4938
Andrew R LeitchSchool of Biological and Chemical Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, London E1 4NS, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Allopolyploidy is acknowledged as an important force in plant evolution. Frequent allopolyploidy in

Indexed as

PolyploidyCytoplasmDNA, PlantEvolution, MolecularGenome, PlantGenome SizeHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingMaternal InheritanceNicotianaPaternal InheritanceRepetitive Sequences, Nucleic AcidSegmental Duplications, GenomicSpecies SpecificityDNA, Plantallopolyploidisationdiploidisationgenome evolutiongenome reorganisationnuclear-cytoplasmic interaction hypothesispolyploidyrepeatsretroelements

Identifiers

PMID32092894
PMCPMC7074350

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.