ArticleGait & posture2020
Reconstruction of the lower limb bones from digitised anatomical landmarks using statistical shape modelling.
Article in Gait & posture, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.
- Shape predicts osteoarthritis progression in the first carpometacarpal joint.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Article
- Article
- PACT: A practice-driven predictive algorithm for customized transradial prosthetic socket design.PloS one · 2026Article
- Predicting normative walking biomechanics across the lifespan using seven simple features.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2025Article
- Reconstruction of Scapula Bone Shapes from Digitized Skin Landmarks Using Statistical Shape Modeling and Multiple Linear Regression.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2025Article
- Leveraging deep learning for nonlinear shape representation in anatomically parameterized statistical shape models.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2025Article
- Database of segmentations and surface models of bones of the entire lower body created from cadaver CT scans.Scientific data · 2023Article
- Extra-Articular Distal Humerus Plate 3D Model Creation by Using the Method of Anatomical Features.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- 3D shape reconstruction of the femur from planar X-ray images using statistical shape and appearance models.Biomedical engineering online · 2023Article
- Applying machine learning methods to enable automatic customisation of knee replacement implants from CT data.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Article
- A novel method forFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023Article
- [Rapid femur modeling method based on statistical shape model].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2022Article
- Article
- Morphological variation in paediatric lower limb bones.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Statistical-Shape Prediction of Lower Limb Kinematics During Cycling, Squatting, Lunging, and Stepping-Are Bone Geometry Predictors Helpful?Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundBone shapes strongly influence force and moment predictions of kinematic and musculoskeletal models used in motion analysis. The precise determination of joint reference frames is essential for accurate predictions. Since clinical motion analysis typically does not include medical imaging, from which bone shapes may be obtained, scaling methods using reference subjects to create subject-specific bone geometries are widely used. RESEARCH QUESTION: This study investigated if lower limb bone shape predictions from skin-based measurements, utilising an underlying statistical shape model (SSM) that corrects for soft tissue artefacts in digitisation, can be used to improve conventional linear scaling methods of bone geometries.
methodsSSMs created from 35 healthy adult femurs and tibiae/fibulae were used to reconstruct bone shapes by minimising the distance between anatomical landmarks on the models and those digitised in the motion laboratory or on medical images. Soft tissue artefacts were quantified from magnetic resonance images and then used to predict distances between landmarks digitised on the skin surface and bone. Reconstruction results were compared to linearly scaled models by measuring root mean squared distances to segmented surfaces, calculating differences of commonly used anatomical measures and the errors in the prediction of the hip joint centre.
resultsSSM reconstructed surface predictions from varying landmark sets from skin and bone landmarks were more accurate compared to linear scaling methods (2.60-2.95 mm vs. 3.66-3.87 mm median error; p < 0.05). No significant differences were found between SSM reconstructions from bony landmarks and SSM reconstructions from digitised landmarks obtained in the motion lab and therefore reconstructions using skin landmarks are as accurate as reconstructions from landmarks obtained from medical images. SIGNIFICANCE: These results indicate that SSM reconstructions can be used to increase the accuracy in obtaining bone shapes from surface digitised experimental data acquired in motion lab environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.