Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32092603›Full record

ArticleGait & posture2020

Reconstruction of the lower limb bones from digitised anatomical landmarks using statistical shape modelling.

Daniel Nolte, Siu-Teing Ko, Anthony M J Bull, Angela E Kedgley

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gait & posture, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Shape predicts osteoarthritis progression in the first carpometacarpal joint.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. A novel method forFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023
    Article
  13. [Rapid femur modeling method based on statistical shape model].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Daniel NolteDepartment of Bioengineering, Imperial College London, London, SW7 2AZ, United Kingdom. Electronic address: d.nolte@imperial.ac.uk.
Siu-Teing KoDepartment of Bioengineering, Imperial College London, London, SW7 2AZ, United Kingdom. Electronic address: siuteing.ko@gmail.com.
Anthony M J BullDepartment of Bioengineering, Imperial College London, London, SW7 2AZ, United Kingdom. Electronic address: a.bull@imperial.ac.uk.
Angela E KedgleyDepartment of Bioengineering, Imperial College London, London, SW7 2AZ, United Kingdom. Electronic address: akedgley@imperial.ac.uk.
Imperial College London · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust 088844/Z/09/ZWellcome Trust 208858
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBone shapes strongly influence force and moment predictions of kinematic and musculoskeletal models used in motion analysis. The precise determination of joint reference frames is essential for accurate predictions. Since clinical motion analysis typically does not include medical imaging, from which bone shapes may be obtained, scaling methods using reference subjects to create subject-specific bone geometries are widely used. RESEARCH QUESTION: This study investigated if lower limb bone shape predictions from skin-based measurements, utilising an underlying statistical shape model (SSM) that corrects for soft tissue artefacts in digitisation, can be used to improve conventional linear scaling methods of bone geometries.

methodsSSMs created from 35 healthy adult femurs and tibiae/fibulae were used to reconstruct bone shapes by minimising the distance between anatomical landmarks on the models and those digitised in the motion laboratory or on medical images. Soft tissue artefacts were quantified from magnetic resonance images and then used to predict distances between landmarks digitised on the skin surface and bone. Reconstruction results were compared to linearly scaled models by measuring root mean squared distances to segmented surfaces, calculating differences of commonly used anatomical measures and the errors in the prediction of the hip joint centre.

resultsSSM reconstructed surface predictions from varying landmark sets from skin and bone landmarks were more accurate compared to linear scaling methods (2.60-2.95 mm vs. 3.66-3.87 mm median error; p < 0.05). No significant differences were found between SSM reconstructions from bony landmarks and SSM reconstructions from digitised landmarks obtained in the motion lab and therefore reconstructions using skin landmarks are as accurate as reconstructions from landmarks obtained from medical images. SIGNIFICANCE: These results indicate that SSM reconstructions can be used to increase the accuracy in obtaining bone shapes from surface digitised experimental data acquired in motion lab environments.

Indexed as

Anatomic LandmarksModels, BiologicalModels, StatisticalAdultAgedBiomechanical PhenomenaFemaleFemurHealthy VolunteersHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedMovementResearch DesignTibiaHip joint centreLandmark digitisationMotion captureMusculoskeletal modellingSoft tissue artefactStatistical shape model

Identifiers

PMID32092603
PMCPMC7090904
OpenAlexW3005597624

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.