Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32092195›Full record

ArticleMovement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society2020

Automated MRI Classification in Progressive Supranuclear Palsy: A Large International Cohort Study.

Salvatore Nigro, Angelo Antonini, David E Vaillancourt, Klaus Seppi, Roberto Ceravolo, Antonio P Strafella, Antonio Augimeri, Andrea Quattrone, Maurizio Morelli, Luca Weis and 11 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. The tauopathies: Neuroimaging characteristics and emerging experimental therapies.Journal of neuroimaging : official journal of the American Society of Neuroimaging · 2022
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Salvatore NigroNeuroscience Centre, Magna Graecia University, Catanzaro, Italy.
Angelo AntoniniDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1040-2807
David E VaillancourtDepartment of Applied Physiology and Kinesiology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
Klaus SeppiDepartment of Neurology, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Roberto CeravoloDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Unit of Neurology, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Antonio P StrafellaKrembil Research Institute, UHN & Research Imaging Centre, Campbell Family Mental Health Research Institute, CAMH, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Antonio AugimeriBiotecnomed S.C. aR.L., Catanzaro, Italy.
Andrea QuattroneDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Institute of Neurology, Magna Graecia University, Catanzaro, Italy.
Maurizio MorelliDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Institute of Neurology, Magna Graecia University, Catanzaro, Italy.
Luca WeisIRCCS San Camillo Hospital, Venice, Italy.
Eleonora FiorenzatoIRCCS San Camillo Hospital, Venice, Italy.
Roberta BiundoIRCCS San Camillo Hospital, Venice, Italy.
Roxana G BurciuDepartment of Kinesiology and Applied Physiology, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware, USA.
Florian KrismerDepartment of Neurology, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-4493-5073
Nikolaus R McFarlandDepartment of Neurology and Biomedical Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
Christoph MuellerDepartment of Neurology, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Elke R GizewskiNeuroimaging Core Facility, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Mirco CosottiniDepartment of Translational Research and New Technologies, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Eleonora Del PreteDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Unit of Neurology, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Sonia MazzucchiDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Unit of Neurology, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Aldo QuattroneNeuroscience Centre, Magna Graecia University, Catanzaro, Italy.

Funding

Scaling and Sequencing Motor Output in Humans: fMRI StudyR01NS052318 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI VAILLANCOURT, DAVID E · 2005 to 2020
$6.0M
Non-Invasive Markers of Neurodegeneration in Movement DisordersR01NS075012 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI LI, YUQING, VAILLANCOURT, DAVID E · 2012 to 2022
$4.1M
Neuroimaging Biomarkers in Parkinsonism: Differentiating Subtypes and Tracking Disease ProgressionU01NS102038 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI CORCOS, DANIEL M., VAILLANCOURT, DAVID E · 2017 to 2019
$2.3M
Advanced 3T for Structural and Functional Imaging at University of FloridaS10OD021726 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI LONG, JOANNA R · 2017 to 2017
$2.0M
NIH HHS R01 NS052318NIH HHS R01 NS075012NIH HHS S10 OD021726NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS052318NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS075012NINDS NIH HHS U01 NS102038
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Magnetic Resonance Parkinsonism Index is listed as one of the most reliable imaging morphometric markers for diagnosis of progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP). However, the use of this index in diagnostic workup has been limited until now by the low generalizability of published results because of small monocentric patient cohorts, the lack of data validation in independent patient series, and manual measurements used for index calculation. The objectives of this study were to investigate the generalizability of Magnetic Resonance Parkinsonism Index performance validating previously established cutoff values in a large international cohort of PSP patients subclassified into PSP-Richardson's syndrome and PSP-parkinsonism and to standardize the use of the automated Magnetic Resonance Parkinsonism Index by providing a web-based platform to obtain homogenous measures around the world.

methodsIn a retrospective international multicenter study, a total of 173 PSP patients and 483 non-PSP participants were enrolled. A web-based platform (https://mrpi.unicz.it) was used to calculate automated Magnetic Resonance Parkinsonism Index values.

resultsMagnetic Resonance Parkinsonism Index values showed optimal performance in differentiating PSP-Richardson's syndrome and PSP-parkinsonism patients from non-PSP participants (93.6% and 86.5% of accuracy, respectively). The Magnetic Resonance Parkinsonism Index was also able to differentiate PSP-Richardson's syndrome and PSP-parkinsonism patients in an early stage of the disease from non-PSP participants (90.1% and 85.9%, respectively). The web-based platform provided the automated Magnetic Resonance Parkinsonism Index calculation in 94% of cases.

conclusionsOur study provides the first evidence on the generalizability of automated Magnetic Resonance Parkinsonism Index measures in a large international cohort of PSP-Richardson's syndrome and PSP-parkinsonism patients. The web-based platform enables widespread applicability of the automated Magnetic Resonance Parkinsonism Index to different clinical and research settings. © 2020 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.

Indexed as

Parkinson DiseaseSupranuclear Palsy, ProgressiveCohort StudiesHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingRetrospective Studiesautomated MRI-based classificationinternational multicenter studyMagnetic Resonance Parkinsonism Indexprogressive supranuclear palsyweb-based platform

Identifiers

PMID32092195
PMCPMC8310687

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.