Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32092145›Full record

ArticleJournal of experimental botany2020

Plot-level rapid screening for photosynthetic parameters using proximal hyperspectral imaging.

Katherine Meacham-Hensold, Peng Fu, Jin Wu, Shawn Serbin, Christopher M Montes, Elizabeth Ainsworth, Kaiyu Guan, Evan Dracup, Taylor Pederson, Steven Driever and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of experimental botany, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed
9.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 102 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Tools for Measuring Photosynthesis at Different Scales.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024
    Article
  14. Phenotyping cotton leaf chlorophyll viaFrontiers in plant science · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Katherine Meacham-HensoldDepartment of Plant Biology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, IL, USA.
Peng FuCarl R. Woese Institute for Genomic Biology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, IL, USA.
Jin WuEnvironmental & Climate Science Department, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York, USA.
Shawn SerbinEnvironmental & Climate Science Department, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York, USA.
Christopher M MontesDepartment of Plant Biology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, IL, USA.
Elizabeth AinsworthDepartment of Plant Biology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, IL, USA.
Kaiyu GuanDepartment of Natural Resources and Environmental Sciences, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, IL, USA.
Evan DracupUSDA ARS Global Change and Photosynthesis Research Unit, Urbana, IL, USA.
Taylor PedersonCarl R. Woese Institute for Genomic Biology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, IL, USA.
Steven DrieverCarl R. Woese Institute for Genomic Biology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, IL, USA.
Carl BernacchiDepartment of Plant Biology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, IL, USA.
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign · USBrookhaven National Laboratory · USUrbana University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Photosynthesis is currently measured using time-laborious and/or destructive methods which slows research and breeding efforts to identify crop germplasm with higher photosynthetic capacities. We present a plot-level screening tool for quantification of photosynthetic parameters and pigment contents that utilizes hyperspectral reflectance from sunlit leaf pixels collected from a plot (~2 m×2 m) in <1 min. Using field-grown Nicotiana tabacum with genetically altered photosynthetic pathways over two growing seasons (2017 and 2018), we built predictive models for eight photosynthetic parameters and pigment traits. Using partial least squares regression (PLSR) analysis of plot-level sunlit vegetative reflectance pixels from a single visible near infra-red (VNIR) (400-900 nm) hyperspectral camera, we predict maximum carboxylation rate of Rubisco (Vc,max, R2=0.79) maximum electron transport rate in given conditions (J1800, R2=0.59), maximal light-saturated photosynthesis (Pmax, R2=0.54), chlorophyll content (R2=0.87), the Chl a/b ratio (R2=0.63), carbon content (R2=0.47), and nitrogen content (R2=0.49). Model predictions did not improve when using two cameras spanning 400-1800 nm, suggesting a robust, widely applicable and more 'cost-effective' pipeline requiring only a single VNIR camera. The analysis pipeline and methods can be used in any cropping system with modified species-specific PLSR analysis to offer a high-throughput field phenotyping screening for germplasm with improved photosynthetic performance in field trials.

Indexed as

Hyperspectral ImagingPlant BreedingChlorophyllPhotosynthesisPlant LeavesChlorophyllField phenotypingfood securityhyperspectral imagingphotosynthesisproximal sensingspectral reflectance

Identifiers

PMID32092145
PMCPMC7134947
OpenAlexW3008623787

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.