Observational studyPloS one2020
Virus-associated anterior uveitis and secondary glaucoma: Diagnostics, clinical characteristics, and surgical options.
Observational study in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cytomegalovirus Infection of the Anterior Segment: Corneal Endotheliitis and Secondary Glaucoma.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- PCR-based detection of viral and parasitic etiologies in anterior uveitis: a cross-sectional study from Iran.BMC ophthalmology · 2025Article
- Clinical and epidemiological features of secondary glaucoma in a Mexican Tertiary Ophthalmology Hospital.International ophthalmology · 2025Observational
- Liver X Receptor-Growth Differentiation Factor 15 Activation Drives Profibrotic Changes in the Aqueous Outflow Tract of Uveitic Glaucoma.The American journal of pathology · 2025Article
- Cytomegalovirus retinitis with panretinal occlusive vasculopathy concealed by hypertensive uveitis: a case report.Journal of Yeungnam medical science · 2024Article
- Viral infections and pathogenesis of glaucoma: a comprehensive review.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2023Review
- Rubella virus-associated uveitis at a tertiary care hospital in Germany between 2013 and 2019.BMC ophthalmology · 2023Article
- Overview and update on cytomegalovirus-associated anterior uveitis and glaucoma.Frontiers in public health · 2023Review
- Polymerase chain reaction in viral anterior uveitis with secondary glaucoma: Analysis of 28 eyes from a tertiary eye care center in South India.Taiwan journal of ophthalmologyArticle
- Glaucoma in Viral Keratouveitis: A Retrospective Review at a Tertiary Eye Hospital.Journal of current glaucoma practiceReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this retrospective, single-center, observational study, we compared the clinical characteristics, analyzed the glaucoma development, and the glaucoma surgery requirement mediators in patients with different virus-associated anterior uveitis (VAU). In total, 270 patients (= eyes) with VAU confirmed by positive Goldmann-Witmer coefficients (GWC) for cytomegalovirus (CMV), herpes simplex virus (HSV), varicella-zoster virus (VZV), rubella virus (RV), and multiple virus (MV) were included. Clinical records of these patients were analyzed. Demographic constitution, clinical findings, glaucoma development, and surgeries were recorded. The concentrations of 27 immune mediators were measured in 150 samples of aqueous humor. The GWC analysis demonstrated positive results for CMV in 57 (21%), HSV in 77 (29%), VZV in 45 (17%), RV in 77 (29%), and MV in 14 (5%) patients. CMV and RV AU occurred predominantly in younger and male patients, while VZV and HSV AU appeared mainly with the elderly and females (P<0.0001). The clinical features of all viruses revealed many similarities. In total, 52 patients (19%) showed glaucomatous damage and of these, 27 patients (10%) needed a glaucoma surgery. Minimal-invasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS) showed a reliable IOP reduction in the short-term period. In 10 patients (37%), the first surgical intervention failed and a follow-up surgery was required. We conclude that different virus entities in anterior uveitis present specific risks for the development of glaucoma as well as necessary surgery. MIGS can be suggested as first-line-treatment in individual cases, however, the device needs to be carefully chosen by experienced specialists based on the individual needs of the patient. Filtrating glaucoma surgery can be recommended in VAU as an effective therapy to reduce the IOP over a longer period of time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.