Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32092059›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2020

Patients' preferences of cutaneous leishmaniasis treatment outcomes: Findings from an international qualitative study.

Astrid C Erber, Byron Arana, Afif Ben Salah, Issam Bennis, Aicha Boukthir, María Del Mar Castro Noriega, Mamoudou Cissé, Gláucia Fernandes Cota, Farhad Handjani, Liliana López-Carvajal and 5 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Leishmaniasis.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Monkeypox: how will we know if the treatments work?The Lancet. Infectious diseases · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Astrid C ErberNuffield Department of Medicine, Centre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-5252-9676
Byron AranaDrugs for Neglected Diseases Initiative (DNDi), Geneva, Switzerland.
Afif Ben SalahInstitut Pasteur de Tunis, Tunis, Tunisia.
Issam BennisNational School of Public Health, Rabat, Morocco.
Aicha BoukthirInstitut Pasteur de Tunis, Tunis, Tunisia.
María Del Mar Castro NoriegaCentro Internacional de Entrenamiento de Investigaciones Médicas (CIDEIM), Cali, Colombia.
Mamoudou CisséCentre MURAZ, Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina Faso.
Gláucia Fernandes CotaInstituto René Rachou (IRR), Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ), Minas Gerais, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-0538-7403
Farhad HandjaniMolecular Dermatology Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Liliana López-CarvajalPrograma de Estudio y Control de Enfermedades Tropicales (PECET), Universidad de Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia.
Kevin MarshNuffield Department of Medicine, Centre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Dalila Martínez MedinaFacultad de Medicina "Alberto Hurtado", Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Perú.ORCID 0000-0002-3475-3962
Emma PluggeNuffield Department of Medicine, Centre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Trudie LangNuffield Department of Medicine, Centre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Piero OlliaroNuffield Department of Medicine, Centre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) is a disease that often affects exposed skin areas and may heal leaving lifelong scars. Patients' expectations from treatment are rarely considered in drug development for CL. An initiative aiming to address shortcomings in clinical trial design and conduct for CL treatments involving the researchers' community is on-going. This manuscript presents patient-preferred outcomes for CL and an assessment on how to consider these in the conduct of future trials. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL

findingsWe report preferred treatment outcomes by 74 patients with confirmed CL in endemic regions of Brazil, Burkina Faso, Colombia, Iran, Morocco, Peru and Tunisia during individual in-depth interviews. Beyond outcomes customarily considered in trials (such as lesion appearance and adverse events), patients talked about a large number of outcomes related to quality of life, such as pain, scar formation, and others affecting their work and daily activities. They also reported fears around getting rid of the parasite, disease recurrence, and possible sequelae. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: The study results provide a rich insight into important outcomes for CL treatments, as well as related topics, from the perspective of a diverse patient population. Among the outcomes identified, we argue that those related to quality of life as well as recurrence should be included to a greater extent for assessment in clinical trials, and discuss the suitability of measurement instruments such as the Dermatology Quality of Life Index (DLQI). Interviews also point out the potential need to address concerns related to parasitological cure or scar formation, such as social stigmatization and disability. In addition, patients should be given information in order to clarify reported misconceptions. This study therefore suggests a methodology for consulting CL patients on outcomes as elements of clinical trial design, and how to incorporate these outcomes in trials. It also discusses how reported outcomes could be addressed in clinical care.

Indexed as

Global HealthPatient PreferenceAntiprotozoal AgentsData CollectionHumansLeishmaniasis, CutaneousQualitative ResearchQuality of LifeTreatment OutcomeAntiprotozoal Agents

Identifiers

PMID32092059
PMCPMC7058360

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.