Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32091972›Full record

ArticleCirculation research2020

A Computational Pipeline to Predict Cardiotoxicity: From the Atom to the Rhythm.

Pei-Chi Yang, Kevin R DeMarco, Parya Aghasafari, Mao-Tsuen Jeng, John R D Dawson, Slava Bekker, Sergei Y Noskov, Vladimir Yarov-Yarovoy, Igor Vorobyov, Colleen E Clancy

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Circulation research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed
7.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 82 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Harnessing AlphaFold to reveal hERG channel conformational state secrets.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Machine Learning-Enabled Drug-Induced Toxicity Prediction.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  10. Review
  11. ACS omega · 2024
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Toward Digital Twin Technology for Precision Pharmacology.JACC. Clinical electrophysiology · 2024
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Pei-Chi Yang *From the Department of Physiology and Membrane Biology (P.-C.Y., K.R.D., P.A., M.-T.J., J.R.D.D., V.Y.-Y., I.V., C.E.C.), University of California Davis.
Kevin R DeMarco *From the Department of Physiology and Membrane Biology (P.-C.Y., K.R.D., P.A., M.-T.J., J.R.D.D., V.Y.-Y., I.V., C.E.C.), University of California Davis.
Parya AghasafariFrom the Department of Physiology and Membrane Biology (P.-C.Y., K.R.D., P.A., M.-T.J., J.R.D.D., V.Y.-Y., I.V., C.E.C.), University of California Davis.
Mao-Tsuen JengFrom the Department of Physiology and Membrane Biology (P.-C.Y., K.R.D., P.A., M.-T.J., J.R.D.D., V.Y.-Y., I.V., C.E.C.), University of California Davis.
John R D DawsonFrom the Department of Physiology and Membrane Biology (P.-C.Y., K.R.D., P.A., M.-T.J., J.R.D.D., V.Y.-Y., I.V., C.E.C.), University of California Davis.
Slava BekkerDepartment of Science and Engineering, American River College, Sacramento, CA (S.B.).
Sergei Y NoskovFaculty of Science, Centre for Molecular Simulations and Department of Biological Sciences, University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada (S.Y.N.).
Vladimir Yarov-YarovoyFrom the Department of Physiology and Membrane Biology (P.-C.Y., K.R.D., P.A., M.-T.J., J.R.D.D., V.Y.-Y., I.V., C.E.C.), University of California Davis.
Igor VorobyovFrom the Department of Physiology and Membrane Biology (P.-C.Y., K.R.D., P.A., M.-T.J., J.R.D.D., V.Y.-Y., I.V., C.E.C.), University of California Davis.
Colleen E ClancyFrom the Department of Physiology and Membrane Biology (P.-C.Y., K.R.D., P.A., M.-T.J., J.R.D.D., V.Y.-Y., I.V., C.E.C.), University of California Davis.
University of California, Davis · USAmerican River College · USUniversity of Calgary · CA

Funding

Development of the Predictive NeuroCardiovascular SimulatorOT2OD026580 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI CLANCY, COLLEEN E, GRANDI, ELEONORA · 2018 to 2021
$5.7M
In silico Safety PharmacologyR01HL128537 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI CLANCY, COLLEEN E, SANTANA, LUIS F · 2016 to 2024
$5.7M
Predictive multiscale in silico cardio-pharmacologyU01HL126273 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI CLANCY, COLLEEN E · 2015 to 2019
$3.8M
Breakthrough Molecular Dynamics Research via an Anton2 SupercomputerR01GM116961 · NIGMS · CARNEGIE-MELLON UNIVERSITY · PI BLOOD, PHILIP D. · 2016 to 2023
$3.0M
Predoctoral Training in Pharmacological SciencesT32GM099608 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI HELL, JOHANNES W · 2012 to 2021
$2.2M
Mechanisms of cAMP CompartmentationR01GM101928 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA RENO · PI HARVEY, ROBERT D · 2012 to 2015
$1.1M
American Heart Association-American Stroke Association 16PRE27260295CIHR 156236NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL128537NHLBI NIH HHS U01 HL126273NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM101928NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM116961NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM099608NIH HHS OT2 OD026580
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleDrug-induced proarrhythmia is so tightly associated with prolongation of the QT interval that QT prolongation is an accepted surrogate marker for arrhythmia. But QT interval is too sensitive a marker and not selective, resulting in many useful drugs eliminated in drug discovery.

objectiveTo predict the impact of a drug from the drug chemistry on the cardiac rhythm. METHODS AND

resultsIn a new linkage, we connected atomistic scale information to protein, cell, and tissue scales by predicting drug-binding affinities and rates from simulation of ion channel and drug structure interactions and then used these values to model drug effects on the hERG channel. Model components were integrated into predictive models at the cell and tissue scales to expose fundamental arrhythmia vulnerability mechanisms and complex interactions underlying emergent behaviors. Human clinical data were used for model framework validation and showed excellent agreement, demonstrating feasibility of a new approach for cardiotoxicity prediction.

conclusionsWe present a multiscale model framework to predict electrotoxicity in the heart from the atom to the rhythm. Novel mechanistic insights emerged at all scales of the system, from the specific nature of proarrhythmic drug interaction with the hERG channel, to the fundamental cellular and tissue-level arrhythmia mechanisms. Applications of machine learning indicate necessary and sufficient parameters that predict arrhythmia vulnerability. We expect that the model framework may be expanded to make an impact in drug discovery, drug safety screening for a variety of compounds and targets, and in a variety of regulatory processes.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationAnti-Arrhythmia AgentsArrhythmias, CardiacCardiotoxicityCardiotoxinsDrug DiscoveryERG1 Potassium ChannelFemaleHumansLong QT SyndromeMachine LearningMaleMoxifloxacinMyocytes, CardiacPhenethylaminesProtein Structure, SecondaryAnti-Arrhythmia AgentsCardiotoxinsdofetilideERG1 Potassium ChannelKCNH2 protein, humanMoxifloxacinPhenethylaminesSulfonamidesTopoisomerase II Inhibitorsarrhythmiascardiac electrophysiologycomputational biologydrug-induced cardiotoxicitymultiscale

Identifiers

PMID32091972
PMCPMC7155920
OpenAlexW3009375540

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.