Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32091658›Full record

ArticleThe oncologist2020

Designing an Effective Colorectal Cancer Screening Program in Egypt: A Qualitative Study of Perceptions of Egyptian Primary Care Physicians and Specialists.

Lori Brand Bateman, Somaia Khamess, Salah-Eldin Abdelmoneim, Waleed Arafat, Mona N Fouad, Yomna Khamis, Abbas Omar, Randa Salah Abdelmoneim, Isabel Scarinci

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The oncologist, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. From Insights to Impact: Understanding Cancer Screening Choices through Mixed-Methods.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Lori Brand BatemanDivision of Preventive Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Medicine, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4705-165X
Somaia KhamessAlexandria University Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria, Egypt.
Salah-Eldin AbdelmoneimAlexandria University Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria, Egypt.
Waleed ArafatAlexandria University Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria, Egypt.
Mona N FouadDivision of Preventive Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Medicine, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.
Yomna KhamisAlexandria University Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria, Egypt.
Abbas OmarAlexandria University Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria, Egypt.
Randa Salah AbdelmoneimAlexandria University Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria, Egypt.
Isabel ScarinciDivision of Preventive Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Medicine, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.
Alexandria University · EGUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · US

Funding

XRAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA013148 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI Robert S Welner · 1985 to 2026
$165.9M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA013148
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn Egypt more than one-third of colorectal cancer (CRC) cases occur in individuals aged 40 years and younger, and are diagnosed at advanced stages; currently, CRC screening is not done as a routine part of preventive care. To lay the foundation for the development of a CRC multilevel screening program in Egypt, this qualitative study aimed to explore the perspectives of Egyptian physicians. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe PRECEDE-PROCEED model, which focuses on predisposing (intrapersonal), reinforcing (interpersonal), and enabling (structural) factors inherent in health behaviors, served as our theoretical framework. Primary health care physicians, oncologists, and gastroenterologists practicing in Alexandria, Egypt, participated in 1 one-hour semistructured interview. Interviews were audio recorded, transcribed, translated into English, and analyzed by thematic analysis.

resultsSeventeen physicians participated (n = 8 specialists and n = 9 primary care physicians). Barriers to CRC screening included socioeconomic status, a lack of emphasis on prevention, fear, and cost (predisposing); a belief that only high risk patients should be screened and a lack of confidence in providers to perform and interpret screening tests appropriately (reinforcing); and cost, lack of availability of the tests, and inadequate training for laboratory technicians and providers (enabling). Potential facilitators included implementing a media campaign emphasizing early detection, curability and prevention (predisposing); educating physicians and eliciting physician engagement (reinforcing); and decreasing costs, making screening tests widely available, and providing well-trained providers (enabling).

conclusionA CRC screening program is needed in Egypt, and to be successful it would likely need to address barriers at multiple levels. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: In Egypt, colorectal screening is not a routine part of preventive care, and colorectal cancer is often diagnosed at an advanced stage in individuals aged 40 years or younger. Screening can prevent and detect colorectal cancer in its early stages, but before designing any screening program, understanding the context is important as cultural beliefs may impact the acceptability of screening methods. By exploring the perspectives of Egyptian physicians, this study found important insights into how screening program components should be considered in the Egyptian culture and lays the foundation for the development of a multilevel colorectal screening program in Egypt.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsPhysicians, Primary CareEarly Detection of CancerEgyptHumansMass ScreeningPerceptionSpecializationColorectal cancerEgyptPhysiciansQualitative interviewsScreening

Identifiers

PMID32091658
PMCPMC7543238
OpenAlexW3008831853

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.