Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32091596›Full record

Trial reportJournal of the National Cancer Institute2020

Durability of Cross-Protection by Different Schedules of the Bivalent HPV Vaccine: The CVT Trial.

Sabrina H Tsang, Joshua N Sampson, John Schussler, Carolina Porras, Sarah Wagner, Joseph Boland, Bernal Cortes, Douglas R Lowy, John T Schiller, Mark Schiffman and 10 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 87 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Observational
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Long-term protective efficacy of theInfectious medicine · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Sabrina H TsangDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Joshua N SampsonDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
John SchusslerInformation Management Services, Silver Spring, MD, USA.
Carolina PorrasAgencia Costarricense de Investigaciones Biomédicas, formerly Proyecto Epidemiológico Guanacaste, Fundación INCIENSA, San José, Costa Rica.
Sarah WagnerDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Joseph BolandDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Bernal CortesAgencia Costarricense de Investigaciones Biomédicas, formerly Proyecto Epidemiológico Guanacaste, Fundación INCIENSA, San José, Costa Rica.
Douglas R LowyDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
John T SchillerDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Mark SchiffmanDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Troy J KempHPV Immunology Laboratory, Leidos Biomedical Research, Inc, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, MD, USA.
Ana Cecilia RodriguezIndependent Consultant, San José, Costa Rica.
Wim QuintDDL Diagnostic Laboratory, Rijswijk, The Netherlands.
Mitchell H GailDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Ligia A PintoHPV Immunology Laboratory, Leidos Biomedical Research, Inc, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, MD, USA.
Paula GonzalezAgencia Costarricense de Investigaciones Biomédicas, formerly Proyecto Epidemiológico Guanacaste, Fundación INCIENSA, San José, Costa Rica.
Allan HildesheimDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Aimée R KreimerDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Rolando HerreroAgencia Costarricense de Investigaciones Biomédicas, formerly Proyecto Epidemiológico Guanacaste, Fundación INCIENSA, San José, Costa Rica.
Costa Rica HPV Vaccine Trial (CVT) Group
National Institutes of Health · USInstituto Costarricense de Investigación y Enseñanza en Nutrición y Salud · CRLeidos (United States) · USDDL Diagnostic Laboratory · NLInformation Management Services · US

Funding

HPV Vaccine TrialZIACP010217 · NCI · DIVISION OF CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY AND GENETICS · PI KREIMER, AIMEE · 2011 to 2025
$42.3M
Understanding Papillomavirus Virion Proteins and VaccinesZIABC009052 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI SCHILLER, JOHN T. · 2009 to 2025
$38.4M
Papillomavirus Virion Proteins and VaccinesZIABC010579 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI LOWY, DOUGLAS R. · 2009 to 2025
$15.4M
NCI NIH HHS N01 CP011005World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Costa Rica HPV Vaccine Trial has documented cross-protection of the bivalent HPV vaccine against HPV31/33/45 up to 7 years after vaccination, even with one dose of the vaccine. However, the durability of such protection remains unknown. Here, we evaluate the efficacy of different schedules of the vaccine against HPV31/33/45 out to 11 years postvaccination, expanding to other nontargeted HPV types.

methodsWe compared the rates of HPV infection in vaccinated women with the rates in a comparable cohort of unvaccinated women. We estimated the average vaccine efficacy (VEavg) against incident infections and tested for a change in VE over time.

resultsAmong 3-dose women, we observed statistically significant cross-protection against HPV31/33/45 (VEavg = 64.4%, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 57.7% to 70.0%). Additionally, we observed borderline, statistically significant cross-protection against HPV35 (VEavg = 23.2%, 95% CI = 0.3% to 40.8%) and HPV58 (VEavg = 21.2%, 95% CI = 4.2% to 35.3%). There was no decrease in VE over time (two-sided Ptrend > .05 for HPV31, -33, -35, -45, and -58). As a benchmark, VEavg against HPV16/18 was 82.0% (95% CI = 77.3% to 85.7%). Among 1-dose women, we observed comparable efficacy against HPV31/33/45 (VEavg = 54.4%, 95% CI = 21.0% to 73.7%). Acquisition of nonprotected HPV types was similar between vaccinated and unvaccinated women, indicating that the difference in HPV infection rates was not attributable to differential genital HPV exposure.

conclusionsSubstantial cross-protection afforded by the bivalent vaccine against HPV31/33/45, and to a lesser extent, HPV35 and HPV58, was sustained and remained stable after 11 years postvaccination, reinforcing the notion that the bivalent vaccine is an effective option for protection against HPV-associated cancers.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAlphapapillomavirusCohort StudiesCosta RicaCross ProtectionFemaleHuman papillomavirus 31HumansImmunization SchedulePapillomavirus InfectionsPapillomavirus VaccinesPrevalenceVaccines, CombinedYoung AdultPapillomavirus VaccinesVaccines, Combined

Identifiers

PMID32091596
PMCPMC7566371
OpenAlexW3008715056

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.