ArticleEmerging infectious diseases2020
Role of Live-Duck Movement Networks in Transmission of Avian Influenza, France, 2016-2017.
Article in Emerging infectious diseases, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.
- Simulating contact networks for livestock disease epidemiology: a systematic review.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2023Pooled it
- Poultry farm density and proximity drive highly pathogenic avian influenza spread.Communications biology · 2025Article
- Spatial risk modelling of highly pathogenic avian influenza in France: Fattening duck farm activity matters.PloS one · 2025Article
- Risk factors for avian influenza in Danish poultry and wild birds during the epidemic from June 2020 to May 2021.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2024Article
- Vaccination of poultry against highly pathogenic avian influenza - part 1. Available vaccines and vaccination strategies.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2023Article
- Impact of palmiped farm density on the resilience of the poultry sector to highly pathogenic avian influenza H5N8 in France.Veterinary research · 2023Article
- Combined Phylogeographic Analyses and Epidemiologic Contact Tracing to Characterize Atypically Pathogenic Avian Influenza (H3N1) Epidemic, Belgium, 2019.Emerging infectious diseases · 2023Article
- Integration of Epidemiological and Genomic Data to Investigate H5N1 HPAI Outbreaks in Northern Italy in 2021-2022.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Phylodynamic analysis of the highly pathogenic avian influenza H5N8 epidemic in France, 2016-2017.Transboundary and emerging diseases · 2022Article
- Disentangling the role of poultry farms and wild birds in the spread of highly pathogenic avian influenza virus in Europe.Virus evolution · 2022Article
- Big data-based risk assessment of poultry farms during the 2020/2021 highly pathogenic avian influenza epidemic in Korea.PloS one · 2022Article
- Dynamics of inter-farm transmission of highly pathogenic avian influenza H5N6 integrating vehicle movements and phylogenetic information.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Unraveling the Contact Network Patterns between Commercial Turkey Operation in North Carolina and the Distribution ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Viral tropism and detection of clade 2.3.4.4b H5N8 highly pathogenic avian influenza viruses in feathers of ducks and geese.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Review
- Avian influenza overview May - August 2020.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2020Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The relative roles that movement and proximity networks play in the spread of highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) viruses are often unknown during an epidemic, preventing effective control. We used network analysis to explore the devastating epidemic of HPAI A(H5N8) among poultry, in particular ducks, in France during 2016-2017 and to estimate the likely contribution of live-duck movements. Approximately 0.2% of live-duck movements could have been responsible for between-farm transmission events, mostly early during the epidemic. Results also suggest a transmission risk of 35.5% when an infected holding moves flocks to another holding within 14 days before detection. Finally, we found that densely connected groups of holdings with sparse connections between groups overlapped farmer organizations, which represents important knowledge for surveillance design. This study highlights the importance of movement bans in zones affected by HPAI and of understanding transmission routes to develop appropriate HPAI control strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.