Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32091080›Full record

ArticleHealth policy and planning2020

The state of diet-related NCD policies in Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Nepal, Pakistan, Tunisia and Vietnam: a comparative assessment that introduces a 'policy cube' approach.

Kent Buse, Wafa Aftab, Sadika Akhter, Linh Bui Phuong, Haroun Chemli, Minakshi Dahal, Anam Feroz, Sayad Hofiani, Nousheen Akber Pradhan, Iqbal Anwar and 7 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health policy and planning, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Salt intake and salt-reduction strategies in South Asia: From evidence to action.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2021
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 9 institutions in 7 countries.

Kent BuseUNAIDS, Avenue Appia 20, 1211 Genève, Switzerland.
Wafa AftabDepartment of Community Health Sciences, Aga Khan University, Stadium Road, P. O. Box 3500, Karachi 74800, Pakistan.
Sadika AkhterHealth System and Population Studies Division, icddrb, GPO Box 128, Dhaka 1000, Bangladesh.
Linh Bui PhuongCenter for Population Health Sciences, Hanoi University of Public Health, No. 1A, Duc Thang Street, Duc Thang Ward, Bac Tu Liem District, Hanoi City, Vietnam.
Haroun ChemliSURVEN (Nutrition Surveillance and Epidemiology in Tunisia) Research Laboratory, 11 Rue Jebel Lakhdar, Bab Saadoun, 1007, Tunis, Tunisia.
Minakshi DahalCenter for Research on Environment, Health and Population Activities (CREHPA), P.O.Box. 9626, Kusunti (near Yatayat office), Lalitpur, Nepal.
Anam FerozDepartment of Community Health Sciences, Aga Khan University, Stadium Road, P. O. Box 3500, Karachi 74800, Pakistan.
Sayad HofianiMinistry of Public Health, Fifth Floor, Central Blood Bank Building, Cinema Pamir Area, Kabul, Afghanistan.
Nousheen Akber PradhanDepartment of Community Health Sciences, Aga Khan University, Stadium Road, P. O. Box 3500, Karachi 74800, Pakistan.
Iqbal AnwarHealth System and Population Studies Division, icddrb, GPO Box 128, Dhaka 1000, Bangladesh.
Hajer Aounallah SkhiriFaculty of Medicine of Tunis, University of Tunis El-Manar, Rue de la Faculte de Medecine, Tunis, Tunisia.
Jalila El AtiNational Institute of Nutrition and Food Technology, SURVEN (Nutrition Surveillance and Epidemiology in Tunisia) Research Laboratory, 11 Rue Jebel Lakhdar, Bab Saadoun, 1007 Tunis, Tunisia.
Kim Bao GiangInstitute of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Hanoi Medical University, No 1 Ton That Tung, Dong da District, Hanoi, Vietnam.
Mahesh PuriCenter for Research on Environment, Health and Population Activities (CREHPA), P.O.Box. 9626, Kusunti (near Yatayat office), Lalitpur, Nepal.
Bashir NoormalMinistry of Public Health, Fifth Floor, Central Blood Bank Building, Cinema Pamir Area, Kabul, Afghanistan.
Fauziah RabbaniDepartment of Community Health Sciences, Aga Khan University, Stadium Road, P. O. Box 3500, Karachi 74800, Pakistan.
Sarah HawkesInstitute for Global Health, University College London, 30 Guilford Street, London WC1N 1EH5, UK.
Aga Khan University · PKInternational Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research · BDMinistry of Public Health · AFFaculté de médecine de TunisHanoi Medical University · VNHanoi University · VNInstitut National de Nutrition et de Technologie Alimentaire · TNJoint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS · CHUniversity College London · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/P025188/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We assessed the technical content of sugar, salt and trans-fats policies in six countries in relation to the World Health Organization 'Best Buys' guidelines for the prevention and control of non-communicable diseases (NCDs). National research teams identified policies and strategies related to promoting healthy diets and restricting unhealthy consumption, including national legislation, development plans and strategies and health sector-related policies and plans. We identified relevant text in relation to the issuing agency, overarching aims, goals, targets and timeframes, specific policy measures and actions, accountability systems, budgets, responsiveness to inequitable vulnerabilities across population groups (including gender) and human rights. We captured findings in a 'policy cube' incorporating three dimensions: policy comprehensiveness, political salience and effectiveness of means of implementation, and equity/rights. We compared diet-related NCD policies to human immunodeficiency virus policies in relation to rights, gender and health equity. All six countries have made high-level commitments to address NCDs, but dietary NCDs policies vary and tend to be underdeveloped in terms of the specificity of targets and means of achieving them. There is patchwork reference to internationally recognized, evidence-informed technical interventions and a tendency to focus on interventions that will encounter least resistance, e.g. behaviour change communication in contrast to addressing food reformulation, taxation, subsidies and promotion/marketing. Policies are frequently at the lower end of the authoritativeness spectrum and have few identified budgetary commitments or clear accountability mechanisms. Of concern is the limited recognition of equity and rights-based approaches. Healthy diet policies in these countries do not match the severity of the NCDs burden nor are they designed in such a way that government action will focus on the most critical dietary drivers and population groups at risk. We propose a series of recommendations to expand policy cubes in each of the countries by re-orienting diet-related policies so as to ensure healthy diets for all.

Indexed as

Developing CountriesHealth PolicyNutrition PolicyDiet, HealthyFemaleHealth EquityHIV InfectionsHuman RightsHumansMaleNoncommunicable Diseasesaccountabilityauthorityhuman rightsNCDspolicy analysisWHO Best Buys

Identifiers

PMID32091080
PMCPMC7225567
OpenAlexW3008844360

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.