SynthesisClinical rheumatology2020
Serum/plasma homocysteine levels in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Clinical rheumatology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Association of homocysteine with ankylosing spondylitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Advances in rheumatology (London, England) · 2021Pooled it
- Nutritional Approaches to Modulate Cardiovascular Disease Risk in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Literature Review.Nutrients · 2023Review
- Relationship Between Plasma Homocysteine and Bone Density, Lean Mass, Muscle Strength and Physical Function in 1480 Middle-Aged and Older Adults: Data from NHANES.Calcified tissue international · 2023Article
- Intracellular homocysteine metabolites in SLE: plasma S-adenosylhomocysteine correlates with coronary plaque burden.Lupus science & medicine · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Published studies have shown contradictory results in the association of serum/plasma levels of homocysteine (HCY) with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). This study is to systematically evaluate the association of serum/plasma HCY levels in SLE. A search was done using PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and ScienceDirect databases up to 7 April 2019. Thirty-six articles including 2919 SLE patients and 3120 healthy controls were finally included in this meta-analysis. The HCY levels were significantly higher in SLE patients than in healthy controls (P < 0.001). The subgroup analysis revealed that Asian, African, Arab, Mixed, White and others as well as ages (< 35 and ≥ 35) had significant higher HCY levels in SLE patients than in the healthy controls. The study indicated that patients with disease activity index scores < 8 (P < 0.001) and ≥ 8 (P = 0.003) of SLE had significant higher HCY levels as compared with the healthy controls. It was also revealed that disease duration in SLE patients for < 10 and ≥ 10 years (P < 0.001) had significant higher HCY levels as compared with the healthy controls. A significant higher HCY level for body mass index (< 23 and ≥ 23) was found as well as measurement type in SLE patients than healthy controls. This meta-analysis demonstrated higher HCY levels in patients with SLE than healthy controls, suggesting a possible role of HCY in the disease.Key Points• Homocysteine (HCY) is closely related to the mechanisms of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).• This study reveals a significant correlation between HCY levels and the various indexes of disease activity.• This study reveals that medication may influence HCY levels in SLE.• This study also discovers that the subgroup analysis of all the factors influences the HCY levels in SLE patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.