Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32090291›Full record

ArticleAnimal cognition2020

Why do dogs look back at the human in an impossible task? Looking back behaviour may be over-interpreted.

Martina Lazzaroni, Sarah Marshall-Pescini, Helena Manzenreiter, Sarah Gosch, Lucy Přibilová, Larissa Darc, Jim McGetrick, Friederike Range

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animal cognition, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. The Untrained Response of Pet Dogs to Human Epileptic Seizures.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Martina LazzaroniDomestication Lab, Konrad Lorenz Institute of Ethology, University of Veterinary Medicine, Vienna, Austria. martina.lazzaroni@vetmeduni.at.ac.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7030-8703
Sarah Marshall-PesciniDomestication Lab, Konrad Lorenz Institute of Ethology, University of Veterinary Medicine, Vienna, Austria.
Helena ManzenreiterComparative Cognition, Messerli Research Institute, University of Veterinary Medicine, Vienna, Austria.
Sarah GoschComparative Cognition, Messerli Research Institute, University of Veterinary Medicine, Vienna, Austria.
Lucy PřibilováComparative Cognition, Messerli Research Institute, University of Veterinary Medicine, Vienna, Austria.
Larissa DarcDomestication Lab, Konrad Lorenz Institute of Ethology, University of Veterinary Medicine, Vienna, Austria.
Jim McGetrickDomestication Lab, Konrad Lorenz Institute of Ethology, University of Veterinary Medicine, Vienna, Austria.
Friederike RangeDomestication Lab, Konrad Lorenz Institute of Ethology, University of Veterinary Medicine, Vienna, Austria. friederike.range@vetmeduni.at.ac.

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF W 1262
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The impossible task paradigm has been extensively used to study the looking back behaviour in dogs. This behaviour is commonly considered a social problem-solving strategy: dogs facing an unsolvable task, soon give up and look back at the experimenter to ask for help. We aimed to test if the looking back in an impossible task does indeed represent a social problem-solving strategy. We used a modified version of the classic impossible task, in which the subjects simultaneously faced three possible and one impossible trials. Additionally, subjects were tested in four different conditions: social condition (with an unknown experimenter); asocial condition (subject alone); 'dummy' human condition (with a 'dummy' human); object condition (with a big sheet of cardboard). Finally, we compared two populations of dogs differing in their experience of receiving help from humans: 20 pet dogs tested in their houses and 31 free-ranging dogs tested in Morocco. We found that the pet dogs and free-ranging dogs had similar persistence in interacting with the impossible task in all conditions. Moreover, subjects looked back with similar latencies at the human, at the dummy human and at the object. Overall, pet dogs looked back longer at the human than free-ranging dogs. This could be interpreted as pet dogs being more attracted to humans and/or having a stronger association between humans and food than free-ranging dogs. Concluding, the looking back in an impossible task does not represent a problem-solving strategy. This behaviour seems rather linked to the subject's persistence, to the salience of the stimuli presented, and potentially to the past reinforcement history.

Indexed as

Behavior, AnimalProblem SolvingAnimalsAttentionDogsFoodHumansReinforcement, PsychologyFree-ranging dogsImpossible taskLooking backPersistence

Identifiers

PMID32090291
PMCPMC7181563

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.