Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32090262›Full record

ArticleDatabase : the journal of biological databases and curation2020

dbPepNeo: a manually curated database for human tumor neoantigen peptides.

Xiaoxiu Tan, Daixi Li, Pengjie Huang, Xingxing Jian, Huihui Wan, Guangzhi Wang, Yuyu Li, Jian Ouyang, Yong Lin, Lu Xie

Open access · goldAbstract readDataset
In one paragraph

Article in Database : the journal of biological databases and curation, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 75 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. TumorAgDB1.0: tumor neoantigen database platform.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Xiaoxiu TanSchool of Medical Instrument and Food Engineering, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, No. 516, Jungong Road, Yangpu District, Shanghai 200093, China.
Daixi LiSchool of Medical Instrument and Food Engineering, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, No. 516, Jungong Road, Yangpu District, Shanghai 200093, China.
Pengjie HuangSchool of Medical Instrument and Food Engineering, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, No. 516, Jungong Road, Yangpu District, Shanghai 200093, China.
Xingxing JianShanghai Center for Bioinformation Technology, Shanghai Academy of Science and Technology, No. 1278, Keyuan Road, Pudong New District, Shanghai 201203, China.
Huihui WanSchool of Medical Instrument and Food Engineering, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, No. 516, Jungong Road, Yangpu District, Shanghai 200093, China.
Guangzhi WangShanghai Center for Bioinformation Technology, Shanghai Academy of Science and Technology, No. 1278, Keyuan Road, Pudong New District, Shanghai 201203, China.
Yuyu LiShanghai Center for Bioinformation Technology, Shanghai Academy of Science and Technology, No. 1278, Keyuan Road, Pudong New District, Shanghai 201203, China.
Jian OuyangShanghai Center for Bioinformation Technology, Shanghai Academy of Science and Technology, No. 1278, Keyuan Road, Pudong New District, Shanghai 201203, China.
Yong LinSchool of Medical Instrument and Food Engineering, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, No. 516, Jungong Road, Yangpu District, Shanghai 200093, China.
Lu XieShanghai Center for Bioinformation Technology, Shanghai Academy of Science and Technology, No. 1278, Keyuan Road, Pudong New District, Shanghai 201203, China.
Shanghai Center For Bioinformation Technology · CNUniversity of Shanghai for Science and Technology · CNShanghai Academy of Science & Technology · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neoantigens can function as actual antigens to facilitate tumor rejection, which play a crucial role in cancer immunology and immunotherapy. Emerging evidence revealed that neoantigens can be used to develop personalized, cancer-specific vaccines. To date, large numbers of immunogenomic peptides have been computationally predicted to be potential neoantigens. However, experimental validation remains the gold standard for potential clinical application. Experimentally validated neoantigens are rare and mostly appear scattered among scientific papers and various databases. Here, we constructed dbPepNeo, a specific database for human leukocyte antigen class I (HLA-I) binding neoantigen peptides based on mass spectrometry (MS) validation or immunoassay in human tumors. According to the verification methods of these neoantigens, the collection of peptides was classified as 295 high confidence, 247 medium confidence and 407 794 low confidence neoantigens, respectively. This can serve as a valuable resource to aid further screening for effective neoantigens, optimize a neoantigen prediction pipeline and study T-cell receptor (TCR) recognition. Three applications of dbPepNeo are shown. In summary, this work resulted in a platform to promote the screening and confirmation of potential neoantigens in cancer immunotherapy. Database URL: www.biostatistics.online/dbPepNeo/.

Indexed as

Antigens, NeoplasmPeptidesCancer VaccinesHumansImmunotherapyNeoplasmsAntigens, NeoplasmCancer VaccinesPeptides

Identifiers

PMID32090262
PMCPMC7043295
OpenAlexW3008682585

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.