Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32090225›Full record

ArticleThe Analyst2020

Optimization of confined direct analysis in real time mass spectrometry (DART-MS).

Edward Sisco, Matthew E Staymates, Thomas P Forbes

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Analyst, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Applications of DESI and DART Mass Spectrometry in Forensic Science.Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Creation and Release of an Updated NIST DART-MS Forensics Database.Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry · 2021
    Article
  8. Forensic applications of DART-MS: A review of recent literature.Forensic chemistry (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Edward SiscoNational Institute of Standards and Technology, USA. edward.sisco@nist.gov.
Matthew E Staymates
Thomas P Forbes
National Institute of Standards and Technology · US

Funding

Intramural NIST DOC 9999-NIST
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Direct analysis in real time mass spectrometry (DART-MS) is seeing increased use in many fields, including forensic science, environmental monitoring, food safety, and healthcare. With increased use, novel configurations of the system have been created to either aid in detection of traditionally difficult compounds or surfaces, provide a more reproducible analysis, and/or chemically image surfaces. This work focuses on increasing the fundamental understanding of one configuration, where the DART ionization gas is confined in a junction, such as with thermal desorption (TD) DART-MS. Using five representative compounds and a suite of visualization tools, the role of the DART ionization gas, Vapur flow rate, gas back pressure, and exit grid voltage were examined to better understand both the chemical and physical processes occurring inside the confined configuration. The use of nitrogen as a DART ionization gas was found to be more beneficial than helium because of enhanced mixing with the analyte vapors, providing a more reproducible response. Lower Vapur flow rates were also found to be advantageous as they increased the analyte residence time in the junction, thus increasing the probability of its ionization. Operation at even lower Vapur flow rates was achieved by modifying the junction to restrict the DART gas flow. The DART exit grid voltage and gas back pressure had little observed impact on analyte response. These results provide the foundation to better understand and identify best practices for using a confined DART-MS configuration.

Identifiers

PMID32090225
PMCPMC7421040
OpenAlexW3005667550

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.