ArticleEC pulmonology and respiratory medicine2019
Cultural and Environmental Enablers and Barriers to Participation and Retention in Clinical Trials for Cancer Research.
Article in EC pulmonology and respiratory medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Patient and Caregiver Reported Barriers to Cancer Clinical Trial Participation: A Scoping Review.Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2026Article
- Designing communication strategies to increase rural participation in clinical trials using the Health Belief Model and strategic communication.Contemporary clinical trials communications · 2026Article
- Barriers and Facilitators to Cancer Clinical Trial Participation: Perspectives of Patients in the ICON-3 Practice-Based Research Network, Nigeria.JCO global oncology · 2025Article
- Research Staff Perspectives on Cancer Clinical Trials and Barriers to Recruitment: A Qualitative Research.Cureus · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundWest Virginia (WV) residents have often rejected participation in community-based cancer research studies. Nationally, 49% of eligible patients participate in clinical trials but less than 10% of patients in WV participate.
objectiveTo understand issues related to recruitment and retention of patients for cancer research in Appalachian WV.
methodsData were obtained from 3 focus groups including: (1) 9 patients who participated in clinical cancer trials, (2) 8 cancer research nurse coordinators, and (3) 10 physicians involved in cancer research. Groups were audio-taped and transcriptions were analyzed using MAXQDA and results were verified by two co-investigators.
resultsMost enablers and barriers identified were cultural as indicated by 72% of patients; 68% nurse coordinators; and 55% physicians. Patients identified personal emotional strength as an enabler, and negative health behaviors and fears as barriers. Enablers that nurses identified were positive patient characteristics and barriers included fear of trials, randomization, and death. Physicians identified enablers as a patient's understanding of the clinical trial and motivation to help others and the inverse of these two enablers as barriers.
conclusionA foundation for improving recruitment and retention of participants in cancer research in Appalachia was identified. The next step will involve cancer community organizations and patients in developing a plan to enhance enablers and overcome barriers to patient recruitment in cancer studies. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Cultural influences must be considered when recruiting for clinical trials. Community organizations educating the public about cancer research may be the key to enhancing patient enrollment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32090209PMC7034422What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.