Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32090175›Full record

ReviewClinical and translational radiation oncology2020

Omission of postoperative radiation after breast conserving surgery: A progressive paradigm shift towards precision medicine.

Pierfrancesco Franco, Fiorenza De Rose, Maria Carmen De Santis, Nadia Pasinetti, Valentina Lancellotta, Bruno Meduri, Icro Meattini, Clinical Oncology Breast Cancer Group (COBCG) Investigators

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical and translational radiation oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Pierfrancesco FrancoDepartment of Oncology, Radiation Oncology, University of Turin, Italy.
Fiorenza De RoseRadiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, Humanitas Cancer Center and Research Hospital, Rozzano, Italy.
Maria Carmen De SantisRadiation Oncology Department, National Cancer Institute, Milan, Italy.
Nadia PasinettiRadiation Oncology Department, University of Brescia and Spedali Civili, Brescia, Italy.
Valentina LancellottaRadiation Oncology Department, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario 'A. Gemelli' IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Bruno MeduriRadiation Oncology Unit, University Hospital of Modena, Modena, Italy.
Icro MeattiniDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences "M. Serio", University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Clinical Oncology Breast Cancer Group (COBCG) Investigators
Agostino Gemelli University Polyclinic · ITAzienda Ospedaliera Citta' della Salute e della Scienza di Torino · ITAzienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi · ITAzienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale degli Spedali Civili di Brescia · ITIRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Radiation therapy is a standard therapeutic option in the post-operative setting for early breast cancer patients after breast conserving surgery, providing a substantial benefit in reducing the risk of local relapse with a consequent survival gain. Nevertheless, the reduction in the burden related to treatment is becoming crucial in modern oncology for both local and systemic therapies and investigational efforts are being put forward by radiations oncologists to identify a subset of women at very low risk to be potentially omitted from post-operative irradiation after breast conservation. Clinical factors, classical pathological parameters and new predictive scores derived from gene expression and next generation sequencing techniques are being integrated in the quest toward a reliable low-risk profile for breast cancer patients. We herein provide a comprehensive overview on the topic.

Indexed as

Breast cancerBreast conserving surgeryElderlyEndocrine therapyLow riskPartial breast irradiationRadiation oncologyRadiotherapy omissionWhole breast irradiation

Identifiers

PMID32090175
PMCPMC7025960
OpenAlexW3005222675

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.