ArticleThe archives of bone and joint surgery2020
Magnetic Resonance Imaging Assessment of Hip Abductor after Total Hip Arthroplasty Using a Direct Lateral Approach.
Article in The archives of bone and joint surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Gait and function after total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the Hardinge versus posterolateral approaches.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2026Pooled it
- Review of Methods for Evaluating Changes in the Tension and Properties of the Gluteus Medius Muscle (GMED) and the Tensor Fascia Latae (TFL) as a Result of Hip Osteoarthritis (HOA) and After Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA)-Could MyotonPRO Assessment Be the New Standard?Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Review
- [Advances in study of surgical approaches and MRI evaluation of total hip arthroplasty].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2024Review
- Investigating the correlation between hip abductor muscle strength and width in anteroposterior pelvic radiographs in hip revision candidates following previous total hip arthroplasty: a cross-sectional study.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSurgical techniques and rehabilitations after total hip arthroplasty (THA) play a significant role in the improvement of pain and limping. This study aimed to assess hip abductor muscle's diameter and its strength after 6 months postoperative THA performed by Hardinge approach.
methodsAfter obtaining the patients' demographic characteristics, the preoperative values of patients' hip abductor muscle diameter were measured using magnetic resonance imaging, and were compared with postoperative values 6 months later. Moreover, the hip abductor muscle's strength was assessed using the Trendelenburg test.
resultsA total of 88 patients participated in this study with a mean age of 47.3±1.574 years. It should be noted that 55.7% of the participants were male. Muscle diameter decreased from a mean value of 27.07±7.485 preoperative to mean value of 25.64±7.353 mm postoperative (
conclusionA decrease was observed in gluteus medius muscle diameter, and the Trendelenburg test results were improved in this study. Moreover, the difference between pre- and postoperative gluteus medius muscle diameters were measured using MRI. It can be concluded that MRI is not an appropriate diagnostic tool for the assessment of abductor strength after THA in the 6-month postoperative visit. Accordingly, it is suggested to evaluate muscle strength before and after each surgery to schedule the following treatment protocol required for each patient.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.