Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32090135›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.)2020

Quantitative and qualitative evaluation of deep learning automatic segmentations of corneal endothelial cell images of reduced image quality obtained following cornea transplant.

Naomi Joseph, Chaitanya Kolluru, Beth A M Benetz, Harry J Menegay, Jonathan H Lass, David L Wilson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Naomi JosephCase Western Reserve University, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Cleveland, Ohio, United States.
Chaitanya KolluruCase Western Reserve University, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Cleveland, Ohio, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3211-7794
Beth A M BenetzCase Western Reserve University and University Hospitals Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Cleveland, Ohio, United States.
Harry J MenegayCase Western Reserve University and University Hospitals Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Cleveland, Ohio, United States.
Jonathan H LassCase Western Reserve University and University Hospitals Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Cleveland, Ohio, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3289-3443
David L WilsonCase Western Reserve University, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Cleveland, Ohio, United States.

Funding

TISSUE CULTURE AND HYBRIDOMA MODULEP30EY011373 · NEI · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI Irina A Pikuleva · 1997 to 2026
$17.7M
Interdisciplinary Biomedical Imaging Training ProgramT32EB007509 · NIBIB · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI DAVID Lynn WILSON, Xin Yu · 2007 to 2026
$5.6M
Image analytics prediction of corneal keratoplasty failureR21EY029498 · NEI · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI BENETZ, BETH ANN, WILSON, DAVID LYNN · 2018 to 2019
$440k
BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING RESEARCH FACILITIESC06RR012463 · NCRR · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI KUTINA, KENNETH L · 1997 to 1997
–
NCRR NIH HHS C06 RR012463NEI NIH HHS P30 EY011373NEI NIH HHS R21 EY029498NIBIB NIH HHS T32 EB007509
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We are developing automated analysis of corneal-endothelial-cell-layer, specular microscopic images so as to determine quantitative biomarkers indicative of corneal health following corneal transplantation. Especially on these images of varying quality, commercial automated image analysis systems can give inaccurate results, and manual methods are very labor intensive. We have developed a method to automatically segment endothelial cells with a process that included image flattening, U-Net deep learning, and postprocessing to create individual cell segmentations. We used 130 corneal endothelial cell images following one type of corneal transplantation (Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty) with expert-reader annotated cell borders. We obtained very good pixelwise segmentation performance (e.g., Dice

Indexed as

corneadeep learningendothelial cell segmentation

Identifiers

PMID32090135
PMCPMC7019185

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.