ArticleNursing open2020
A qualitative focus group discussion study on the experiences of Certified Nurses in Dementia Nursing related to effective staff education.
Article in Nursing open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Advancing dementia-friendly hospital care: a systematic review of healthcare professionals' reported barriers and facilitators using the theoretical domains framework.Age and ageing · 2026Pooled it
- Why are people with dementia overlooked in long-term care insurance policy in Guangzhou, China?BMC health services research · 2024Article
- Perceived lack of behavioral control is a barrier to a healthy lifestyle in post-menopause: a qualitative study.Journal of health, population, and nutrition · 2024Article
- Development of the dementia attitude scale focusing on well-being.Frontiers in psychology · 2024Article
- A qualitative focus group discussion study on the experiences of Certified Nurses in Dementia Nursing related to effective staff education.Nursing open · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: To explore the experiences of Certified Nurses in Dementia Nursing (DCNs) concerning the effective education of staff in acute hospitals. Background: In Japan, the number of inpatients with dementia who need medical care continues to increase. DCNs play an important role in educating medical staff about dementia care in acute hospitals. However, there is a lack of a clear understanding in this regard. Design: A qualitative design using a thematic analysis. Methods: Data were extracted from a focus group discussion conducted with 10 DCNs working in 10 different acute hospitals in central Japan. Participants answered semi-structured, open-ended questions about their experiences related to effective staff education. Categories, subcategories and themes were created. This study complied with the Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research. Results: The two themes identified were "building a foundation for dementia care education" and "continuous support based on practical processes."
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.