ArticleNursing open2020
Nursing research priorities based on CINAHL database: A scoping review.
Article in Nursing open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Service continuity of community-based health and social care organisations in times of disaster and health emergencies: a mapping review.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- Research Priorities for Nursing and Allied Health: A Priority-Setting Project Using a Partnership Approach.Journal of advanced nursing · 2026Article
- Italian Nursing Research: A Bibliometric Analysis from 1980 to 2020.Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy) · 2024Review
- [For the first time: research agenda for oncological nursing].Urologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2024Article
- Nursing Practice and Telehealth in School Health Services: A Scoping Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- A Scoping Review: Do instruments measuring genomic competence in nursing incorporate ethics?Nursing open · 2023Article
- Collaborative Learning through a Virtual Community of Practice in Dementia Care Support: A Scoping Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Translation, Adaptation, and Psychometric Validation of the Spanish Version of the Attitudes towards Research and Development within Nursing Questionnaire.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Barriers and Facilitators Perceived by Spanish Experts Concerning Nursing Research: A Delphi Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Article
- Nursing research priorities based on CINAHL database: A scoping review.Nursing open · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: To analyse nursing research based on the CINAHL database to identify research priorities for nursing. Design: A scoping literature review was conducted. The CINAHL Plus (EBSCO) Full Text was searched between 2012-2018. Methods: Out of 1522 original publications, 91 fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal tools were applied. Data were analysed by a thematic analysis method. Results: A strong emphasis should be put on development and evaluation of nursing theories and, in addition, randomized controlled trial studies, meta-synthesis, experimental and intervention studies are needed in nursing research. Development of competencies and skills in the nursing profession ought to be studied more extensively and research should be focused on variety fields of nursing practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.