Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32089583›Full record

ArticleProceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering2019

Harmonizing 1.5T/3T Diffusion Weighted MRI through Development of Deep Learning Stabilized Microarchitecture Estimators.

Vishwesh Nath, Samuel Remedios, Prasanna Parvathaneni, Colin B Hansen, Roza G Bayrak, Camilo Bermudez, Justin A Blaber, Kurt G Schilling, Vaibhav A Janve, Yurui Gao and 9 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. LEARNING 3D WHITE MATTER MICROSTRUCTURE FROM 2D HISTOLOGY.Proceedings. IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging · 2019
    Article
  7. Coronary Calcium Detection using 3D Attention Identical Dual Deep Network Based on Weakly Supervised Learning.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2019
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Vishwesh NathComputer Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN.
Samuel RemediosDept. of Computer Science, Middle Tennessee State University.
Prasanna ParvathaneniElectrical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN.
Colin B HansenComputer Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN.
Roza G BayrakComputer Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN.
Camilo BermudezBiomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN.
Justin A BlaberComputer Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN.
Kurt G SchillingBiomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN.
Vaibhav A JanveVanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.
Yurui GaoVanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.
Yuankai HuoComputer Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN.
Ilwoo LyuComputer Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN.
Owen WilliamsLaboratory of Behavioral Neuroscience, National Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health, Baltimore, MD.
Susan ResnickLaboratory of Behavioral Neuroscience, National Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health, Baltimore, MD.
Lori Beason-HeldLaboratory of Behavioral Neuroscience, National Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health, Baltimore, MD.
Baxter P RogersVanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.
Iwona StepniewskaDept. of Psychology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN.
Adam W AndersonBiomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN.
Bennett A LandmanComputer Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN.

Funding

VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY CTSA FOR PEDIATRIC RESEARCHUL1RR024975 · NCRR · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI BERNARD, GORDON RAPHAEL · 2007 to 2011
$45.7M
The Vanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research (VICTR)UL1TR000445 · NCATS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI BERNARD, GORDON RAPHAEL · 2012 to 2016
$41.4M
Research Education ComponentP30AG066507 · NIA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Corinne Pettigrew · 2020 to 2026
$29.3M
Postdoctoral Training in Biomedical MRI and MRST32EB001628 · NIBIB · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI John C Gore · 2003 to 2026
$7.0M
Controlling Quality and Capturing Uncertainty in Advanced Diffusion Weighted MRIR01EB017230 · NIBIB · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI LANDMAN, BENNETT A. · 2015 to 2024
$5.1M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000445NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR024975NIA NIH HHS P30 AG066507NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB017230NIBIB NIH HHS T32 EB001628
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI) is interpreted as a quantitative method that is sensitive to tissue microarchitecture at a millimeter scale. However, the sensitization is dependent on acquisition sequences (e.g., diffusion time, gradient strength, etc.) and susceptible to imaging artifacts. Hence, comparison of quantitative DW-MRI biomarkers across field strengths (including different scanners, hardware performance, and sequence design considerations) is a challenging area of research. We propose a novel method to estimate microstructure using DW-MRI that is robust to scanner difference between 1.5T and 3T imaging. We propose to use a null space deep network (NSDN) architecture to model DW-MRI signal as fiber orientation distributions (FOD) to represent tissue microstructure. The NSDN approach is consistent with histologically observed microstructure (on previously acquired ex vivo squirrel monkey dataset) and scan-rescan data. The contribution of this work is that we incorporate identical dual networks (IDN) to minimize the influence of scanner effects via scan-rescan data. Briefly, our estimator is trained on two datasets. First, a histology dataset was acquired on three squirrel monkeys with corresponding DW-MRI and confocal histology (512 independent voxels). Second, 37 control subjects from the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging (67-95 y/o) were identified who had been scanned at 1.5T and 3T scanners (b-value of 700 s/mm

Indexed as

Deep LearningDual NetworkDW-MRIFiber Orientation DistributionHarmonizationNull SpaceSpherical Harmonics

Identifiers

PMID32089583
PMCPMC7034942

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.