Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32089546›Full record

ArticleGenetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics2020

The critical role of psychosine in screening, diagnosis, and monitoring of Krabbe disease.

Adam J Guenzel, Coleman T Turgeon, Kim K Nickander, Amy L White, Dawn S Peck, Gisele B Pino, April L Studinski, Vinod K Prasad, Joanne Kurtzberg, Maria L Escolar and 14 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors at 10 institutions in 1 country.

Adam J GuenzelBiochemical Genetics Laboratory, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Coleman T TurgeonBiochemical Genetics Laboratory, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Kim K NickanderBiochemical Genetics Laboratory, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Amy L WhiteBiochemical Genetics Laboratory, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Dawn S PeckBiochemical Genetics Laboratory, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Gisele B PinoBiochemical Genetics Laboratory, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
April L StudinskiBiochemical Genetics Laboratory, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Vinod K PrasadDepartment of Pediatrics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
Joanne KurtzbergDepartment of Pediatrics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
Maria L EscolarDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Maria Laura Duque LasioDepartment of Pediatrics, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Joan E PellegrinoDepartment of Pediatrics, Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, USA.
Ai SakonjuDepartment of Pediatrics, Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, USA.
Rachel E HickeyAnn and Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Natalie M ShallowVanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Margie A ReamNationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH, USA.
Joseph J OrsiniNewborn Screening Program, Wadsworth Center, New York State Department of Health, Albany, NY, USA.
Michael H GelbDepartments of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Kimiyo RaymondBiochemical Genetics Laboratory, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Dimitar K GavrilovBiochemical Genetics Laboratory, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Devin OglesbeeBiochemical Genetics Laboratory, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Piero RinaldoBiochemical Genetics Laboratory, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Silvia TortorelliBiochemical Genetics Laboratory, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Dietrich MaternBiochemical Genetics Laboratory, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA. matern@mayo.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6298-4138
Mayo Clinic · USDuke Medical Center · USSUNY Upstate Medical University · USLurie Children's Hospital · USNationwide Children's Hospital · USNew York State Department of Health · USUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical Center · USUniversity of Washington · USVanderbilt University Medical Center · USWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeNewborn screening (NBS) for Krabbe disease (KD) is performed by measurement of galactocerebrosidase (GALC) activity as the primary test. This revealed that GALC activity has poor specificity for KD. Psychosine (PSY) was proposed as a disease marker useful to reduce the false positive rate for NBS and for disease monitoring. We report a highly sensitive PSY assay that allows identification of KD patients with minimal PSY elevations.

methodsPSY was extracted from dried blood spots or erythrocytes with methanol containing d

resultsAnalysis of PSY in samples from controls (N = 209), GALC pseudodeficiency carriers (N = 55), GALC pathogenic variant carriers (N = 27), patients with infantile KD (N = 26), and patients with late-onset KD (N = 11) allowed for the development of an effective laboratory screening and diagnostic algorithm. Additional longitudinal measurements were used to track therapeutic efficacy of hematopoietic stem cell transplantion (HSCT).

conclusionThis study supports PSY quantitation as a critical component of NBS for KD. It helps to differentiate infantile from later onset KD variants, as well as from GALC variant and pseudodeficiency carriers. Additionally, this study provides further data that PSY measurement can be useful to monitor KD progression before and after treatment.

Indexed as

Leukodystrophy, Globoid CellPsychosineDried Blood Spot TestingGalactosylceramidaseHumansInfant, NewbornNeonatal ScreeningGalactosylceramidasePsychosinebiomarkerdried blood spotKrabbe diseasenewborn screeningpsychosine

Identifiers

PMID32089546
OpenAlexW3006707538

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.