Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32089133›Full record

ArticleBMC biology2020

Patterns of African and Asian admixture in the Afrikaner population of South Africa.

N Hollfelder, J C Erasmus, R Hammaren, M Vicente, M Jakobsson, J M Greeff, C M Schlebusch

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Prevalence of Clinically Relevant GermlineFrontiers in genetics · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Globally RareFrontiers in oncology · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

N HollfelderHuman Evolution, Department of Organismal Biology, Uppsala University, Norbyvägen 18C, SE-752 36, Uppsala, Sweden.
J C ErasmusDepartment of Biochemistry, Genetics and Microbiology, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, 0002, South Africa.
R HammarenHuman Evolution, Department of Organismal Biology, Uppsala University, Norbyvägen 18C, SE-752 36, Uppsala, Sweden.
M VicenteHuman Evolution, Department of Organismal Biology, Uppsala University, Norbyvägen 18C, SE-752 36, Uppsala, Sweden.
M JakobssonHuman Evolution, Department of Organismal Biology, Uppsala University, Norbyvägen 18C, SE-752 36, Uppsala, Sweden.
J M GreeffDepartment of Biochemistry, Genetics and Microbiology, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, 0002, South Africa. jaco.greeff@up.ac.za.
C M SchlebuschHuman Evolution, Department of Organismal Biology, Uppsala University, Norbyvägen 18C, SE-752 36, Uppsala, Sweden. carina.schlebusch@ebc.uu.se.ORCID 0000-0002-8160-9621

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Afrikaner population of South Africa is the descendants of European colonists who started to colonize the Cape of Good Hope in the 1600s. In the early days of the colony, mixed unions between European males and non-European females gave rise to admixed children who later became incorporated into either the Afrikaner or the Coloured populations of South Africa. Differences in ancestry, social class, culture, sex ratio and geographic structure led to distinct and characteristic admixture patterns in the Afrikaner and Coloured populations. The Afrikaner population has a predominant European composition, whereas the Coloured population has more diverse ancestries. Genealogical records previously estimated the contribution of non-Europeans into the Afrikaners to be between 5.5 and 7.2%.

resultsTo investigate the genetic ancestry of the Afrikaner population today (11-13 generations after initial colonization), we genotyped approximately five million genome-wide markers in 77 Afrikaner individuals and compared their genotypes to populations across the world to determine parental source populations and admixture proportions. We found that the majority of Afrikaner ancestry (average 95.3%) came from European populations (specifically northwestern European populations), but that almost all Afrikaners had admixture from non-Europeans. The non-European admixture originated mostly from people who were brought to South Africa as slaves and, to a lesser extent, from local Khoe-San groups. Furthermore, despite a potentially small founding population, there is no sign of a recent bottleneck in the Afrikaner compared to other European populations. Admixture amongst diverse groups from Europe and elsewhere during early colonial times might have counterbalanced the effects of a small founding population.

conclusionsWhile Afrikaners have an ancestry predominantly from northwestern Europe, non-European admixture signals are ubiquitous in the Afrikaner population. Interesting patterns and similarities could be observed between genealogical predictions and our genetic inferences. Afrikaners today have comparable inbreeding levels to current-day European populations.

Indexed as

Genetic VariationGenotypeEnslaved PersonsFemaleHumansMaleSouth AfricaWhite PeopleAdmixtureAfrikanerColonial timesSlave tradeSouth Africa

Identifiers

PMID32089133
PMCPMC7038537

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.