Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32089110›Full record

ArticlePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2020

General theory of topological explanations and explanatory asymmetry.

Daniel Kostić

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Descriptive understanding and prediction in COVID-19 modelling.History and philosophy of the life sciences · 2021
    Article
  5. Are topological explanations really free of mechanisms?Theory in biosciences = Theorie in den Biowissenschaften · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Hierarchy and levels: analysing networks to study mechanisms in molecular biology.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2020
    Article
  8. Shifting levels of ecological network's analysis reveals different system properties.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2020
    Article
  9. Unifying the essential concepts of biological networks: biological insights and philosophical foundations.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Daniel KostićUniversity Bordeaux Montaigne, Department of Philosophy and EA 4574 'Sciences, Philosophie, Humanités' (SPH) at University of Bordeaux, Allée Geoffroy Saint-Hilaire, Bâtiment B2, 33615 Pessac cedex, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this paper, I present a general theory of topological explanations, and illustrate its fruitfulness by showing how it accounts for explanatory asymmetry. My argument is developed in three steps. In the first step, I show what it is for some topological property

Indexed as

Biological Science DisciplinesModels, Theoreticalcounterfactual dependenciesexplanatory asymmetriesexplanatory perspectivismexplanatory unificationfacticity of explanationphilosophical theory of explanation

Identifiers

PMID32089110
PMCPMC7061961

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.