ReviewJournal of the American Heart Association2020
Time to Shock the System: Moving Beyond the Current Paradigm for Primary Prevention Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Use.
Review in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Multimodal AI to forecast arrhythmic death in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.Nature cardiovascular research · 2025Article
- Drug therapy and catheter ablation for management of arrhythmias in continuous flow left ventricular assist device's patients: a Clinical Consensus Statement of the European Heart Rhythm Association and the Heart Failure Association of the ESC.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2024Article
- Article
- QRS-T angle: is it a specific parameter associated with sudden cardiac death in type 2 diabetes? Results from the SURDIAGENE and the Mini-Finland prospective cohorts.Diabetologia · 2024Article
- Patients' Perspectives Regarding Generator Exchanges of Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators.Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes · 2023Article
- Racial differences in setting of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator placement in older adults with heart failure and association with disparate post-implant outcomes.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Article
- Polygenic Risk Score Predicts Sudden Death in Patients With Coronary Disease and Preserved Systolic Function.Journal of the American College of Cardiology · 2022Article
- Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator in Primary and Secondary Prevention of SCD-What We Still Don't Know.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2022Review
- Arrhythmias in heart failure-Where the past meets the future.Heart rhythm O2 · 2021Article
- Prospective evaluation of health status, quality of life and clinical outcomes following implantable defibrillator generator exchange.Journal of geriatric cardiology : JGC · 2021Article
- Mandates for Shared Decisions: Means to which Ends?The Journal of law, medicine & ethics : a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics · 2021Review
- Time to Shock the System: Moving Beyond the Current Paradigm for Primary Prevention Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Use.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2020Review
- Implantable cardioverter defibrillators for primary prevention in cardiomyopathies.Indian heart journalArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.