Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32088786›Full record

ArticleEsophagus : official journal of the Japan Esophageal Society2020

Chemoradiotherapy and radiotherapy alone in patients with esophageal cancer aged 80 years or older based on the Comprehensive Registry of Esophageal Cancer in Japan.

Keiichi Jingu, Hodaka Numasaki, Yasushi Toh, Kenji Nemoto, Takashi Uno, Yuichiro Doki, Hisahiro Matsubara

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Esophagus : official journal of the Japan Esophageal Society, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Keiichi JinguJapan Esophageal Society, Tokyo, Japan. kjingu-jr@rad.med.tohoku.ac.jp.ORCID 0000-0002-7032-1577
Hodaka NumasakiJapan Esophageal Society, Tokyo, Japan.
Yasushi TohJapan Esophageal Society, Tokyo, Japan.
Kenji NemotoJapan Esophageal Society, Tokyo, Japan.
Takashi UnoJapan Esophageal Society, Tokyo, Japan.
Yuichiro DokiJapan Esophageal Society, Tokyo, Japan.
Hisahiro MatsubaraJapan Esophageal Society, Tokyo, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere has been no definitive evidence of chemoradiotherapy being superior to radiotherapy alone in patients aged 80 years or older. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the results of radiotherapy and chemoradiotherapy in patients aged 80 years or older with esophageal cancer in the Japanese Nationwide Cancer Database.

methodsA total of 358 patients aged 80 years or older who were treated with radiotherapy alone or with chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer between 2009 and 2011 were enrolled.

resultsThe 5-year overall survival (OS) rates in patients with cStages 0-I, II, III and IV were 40.9%, 24.7%, 12.2% and 4.9%, respectively. The 5-year cause-specific survival (CSS) rates in patients aged 80 years or older with cStages 0-I, cStage II, cStage III and cStage IV were 73.5%, 41.4%, 25.3% and 7.4%, respectively. In patients treated with radiotherapy alone, the 5-year OS rates for patients with cStages 0-I, II, III and IV were 36.5%, 12.0%, 5.4% and 0%, respectively. In patients treated with chemoradiotherapy, the 5-year OS rates for patients with cStages 0-I, II, III and IV were 45.0%, 36.1%, 16.4% and 7.1%, respectively. In multivariate analysis, chemoradiotherapy, early stage and squamous cell carcinoma were significantly favorable prognostic factors for OS in patients aged 80 years or older (p < 0.001, p < 0.001 and p = 0.0323, respectively). We were unable to evaluate toxicities, because of lack of information in the registry.

conclusionConcurrent chemotherapy with radiotherapy for esophageal cancer in patients aged 80 years or older is a significantly favorable prognostic factor for OS. However, chemoradiotherapy should be carefully selected in elderly patients.

Indexed as

Aged, 80 and overCarcinoma, Squamous CellChemoradiotherapyCombined Modality TherapyData ManagementEarly Detection of CancerEsophageal NeoplasmsFemaleHumansJapanMaleNeoplasm StagingPrognosisRadiation DosageRadiotherapyRegistriesChemoradiotherapyElderly patientsEsophageal cancerNationwide surveyRadiotherapy

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.