ArticleInternational journal of colorectal disease2020
KRAS mutations by digital PCR in circulating tumor cells isolated from the mesenteric vein are associated with residual disease and overall survival in resected colorectal cancer patients.
Article in International journal of colorectal disease, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Circulating tumour cell isolation, analysis and clinical application.Cellular oncology (Dordrecht, Netherlands) · 2023Review
- T7 Endonuclease I-mediated voltammetric detection of KRAS mutation coupled with horseradish peroxidase for signal amplification.Mikrochimica acta · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeIn colorectal cancer (CRC), circulating tumor cells (CTCs) are released into the mesenteric veins (MV). We chose to determine whether KRAS mutations detected in CTCs from blood obtained at the time of surgery could be a marker of survival.
methodsFrom 52 surgically resected CRC patients who later relapsed, samples of tumor tissue, normal tissue, and blood from the peripheral vein (PV) and MV were obtained from each patient at the time of surgery. KRAS mutations were assessed by Sanger sequencing and digital PCR (DGPCR) in tissue samples and by DGPCR in CTCs. Mutant KRAS copy number was assessed in CTCs. Results were correlated with overall survival (OS).
resultsSanger sequencing detected KRAS mutations in ten tumor samples (19.2%), while DGPCR detected mutations in 30 (58%). Mutations were detected in CTCs in 21 MV samples (40.4%) and 18 PV samples (34.6%). Patients with G13D mutations in CTCs from the MV had shorter OS than those with G12D mutations (28.1 vs 54.6 months; p = 0.025). Patients with a high mutant KRAS copy number in CTCs had shorter OS than those with a low mutant KRAS copy number (MV: 20.5 vs 43.7 months; p = 0.002; PV: 15.1 vs 38.2 months; p = 0.027).
conclusionDGPCR is more efficient than Sanger sequencing for detecting KRAS mutations. KRAS G13D mutations and high mutant KRAS copy number are associated with shorter OS. The analysis of KRAS mutations in CTCs from blood obtained at the time of surgery can identify patients with a higher risk of relapse.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.