ArticleKidney international2020
Diagnosis of uncertain significance: can next-generation sequencing replace the clinician?
Article in Kidney international, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The pathophysiology of distal renal tubular acidosis.Nature reviews. Nephrology · 2023Review
- Whole-exome sequencing and variant spectrum in children with suspected inherited renal tubular disorder: the East India Tubulopathy Gene Study.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2022Article
- Diagnoses of uncertain significance: kidney genetics in the 21st century.Nature reviews. Nephrology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
New sequencing technologies are revolutionizing disease gene discovery and testing with tremendous benefits for the diagnosis of rare diseases. However, the more we sequence, the more we discover, and the challenge is to assess the numerous variants in the clinical and genetic context carefully to establish the correct diagnosis. Clinicians and geneticists must work together for this because failure to do so can result in incorrect advice with potentially serious consequences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32087887What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.