Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32087726›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2020

Medical students' experiences with sexual discrimination and perceptions of equal opportunity: a pilot study in Germany.

Konstantin Jendretzky, Lukas Boll, Sandra Steffens, Volker Paulmann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Gender inequity and sexual harassment in the pharmacy profession: Evidence and call to action.American journal of health-system pharmacy : AJHP : official journal of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Konstantin JendretzkyDean's Office - Curriculum Development, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Lukas BollInstitute for Sociology - Work Group Methods of Empirical Research, Leibniz University, Hannover, Germany.
Sandra SteffensDean's Office - Curriculum Development, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Volker PaulmannDean's Office - Evaluation Office, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany. paulmann.volker@mh-hannover.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9143-2794

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundData is available on sexual discrimination and subjective perceptions of equal opportunity in medical education for many countries. Surveys focussing on sexual harassment have not yet been conducted at German medical schools.

methodsA student initiative surveyed all medical students at the Hannover Medical School (MHH) using an anonymous online questionnaire on equal opportunity and sexual discrimination to identify potential problems in education.

resultsA total of 343 students (15%) participated in the survey. Over 50% reported having either witnessed sexual harassment or experienced it themselves. Female students indicated having experienced sexual harassment three times more often than their male peers; verbal forms of sexual discrimination predominate. These observations and experiences of sexual harassment demonstrated significant influences on many perceptions regarding equal opportunity and equal treatment in the MHH undergraduate medical education at MHH.

conclusionThis blind spot in medical education in the German-speaking countries should be scrutinized more closely. The experience of sexism in the context of undergraduate medical education, which has negative effects on students, should no longer be ignored in empirical education research.

Indexed as

Civil RightsDatabases, FactualEducation, Medical, UndergraduateFemaleGermanyHumansIncidenceMaleNeeds AssessmentPerceptionPilot ProjectsRisk AssessmentSchools, MedicalSexismSexual HarassmentStudents, MedicalDiscriminationEqual opportunityGenderMedical educationMedicineSexSexism

Identifiers

PMID32087726
PMCPMC7036258

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.