Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32087612›Full record

ArticleCancer medicine2020

Integrative clinical and biopathology analyses to understand the clinical heterogeneity of infantile rhabdomyosarcoma: A report from the French MMT committee.

Thibault Butel, Marie Karanian, Gaelle Pierron, Daniel Orbach, Dominique Ranchere, Nathalie Cozic, Louise Galmiche, Aurore Coulomb, Nadège Corradini, Brigitte Lacour and 9 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 14 institutions in 2 countries.

Thibault ButelDepartment of Pediatric and Adolescent Oncology, Gustave Roussy (GR), Villejuif, France.
Marie KaranianDepartment of Biopathology and Univ Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, INSERM 1052, CNRS 5286, Cancer Research Center of Lyon, Lyon, France.
Gaelle PierronDepartment of Molecular Biology, Institut Curie, Paris, France.
Daniel OrbachInstitut Curie, SIREDO Oncology Center (Care, Innovation and research for children and AYA with cancer), PSL Research University, Paris, France.
Dominique RanchereDepartment of Biopathology and Univ Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, INSERM 1052, CNRS 5286, Cancer Research Center of Lyon, Lyon, France.
Nathalie CozicDepartment of Biostatistics, Gustave Roussy (GR), Villejuif, France.
Louise GalmicheDepartment of Biopatholgy, Necker Hospital, Paris, France.
Aurore CoulombDepartment of Biopathology, Trousseau Hospital, Paris, France.
Nadège CorradiniDepartment of Pediatric and Adolescent Oncology, Centre Leon Berard, Lyon, France.
Brigitte LacourFrench National Registry of Childhood Solid Tumors, CHU Nancy, France.
Stéphanie ProustDepartment of Pediatric and Adolescent Hematogy and Oncology, CHU Angers, Angers, France.
Florent GuerinDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, CHU Bicetre, AP-HP, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France.
Hélène BoutrouxDepartment of Pediatric and Adolescent Hematogy and Oncology, Trousseau Hospital (AP-HP), Paris, France.
Angélique RomeDepartment of Pediatric and Adolescent Hematogy and Oncology, La Timone Hospital, Marseille, France.
Ludovic MansuyDepartment of Pediatric and Adolescent Hematogy and Oncology, Nancy Hospital, Nancy, France.
Cécile VéritéDepartment of Pediatric and Adolescent Hematogy and Oncology, Pellegrin Hospital, Bordeaux, France.
Anne-Sophie DefachellesDepartment of Pediatric and Adolescent Oncology, Oscar Lambret Centre, Lille, France.
Franck TirodeDepartment of Translational Research and Innovation, Centre Léon Bérard, Univ Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, INSERM 1052, CNRS 5286, Cancer Research Center of Lyon, Lyon, France.ORCID 0000-0003-4731-7817
Veronique Minard-ColinDepartment of Pediatric and Adolescent Oncology, Gustave Roussy (GR), Villejuif, France.ORCID 0000-0002-0296-5207
Institut Gustave Roussy · FRUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1 · FRSorbonne Université · FRBicêtre Hospital · FRCentre Hospitalier Régional et Universitaire de Nancy · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire d'Angers · FRCentre Léon Bérard · FRCentre Oscar Lambret · FRDélégation Paris 5 · FRHôpital de la Timone · FRHôpital Necker-Enfants Malades · FRHôpital Pellegrin · FRInstitut Curie · FRUniversité Paris Sciences et Lettres · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) in infants is a particular entity with various clinical presentations and outcomes. To better understand the clinical heterogeneity of RMS in infants, an integrative clinical, histological, and molecular analysis was performed.

methodsFrom 1989 to 2015, 37 infants aged less than 6 months with a diagnosis of RMS and archival tumor materials were identified in France. Clinical data, central pathologic review, and molecular profile including RNA sequencing were analyzed.

resultsNineteen patients (51%) had embryonal RMS (ERMS) (including three highly differentiated ERMS with PTCH deletion), eight (22%) had spindle cell RMS (SRMS) (three VGLL2-, one NTRK-, and two (B)RAF-fusions), six (16%) had alveolar RMS (ARMS) (all FOXO1- or PAX3-fusion), two had unclassified RMS, and two poorly differentiated RMS were retrospectively diagnosed as rhabdoid tumors (RT) with loss of INI1 expression. The two RT patients died of rapid disease progression. Five-year event-free (EFS) and overall survival (OS) for RMS were 62% (95%CI, 47-82) and 52% (95%CI, 37-72). Eleven patients (31%) relapsed and four (11%) had primary refractory disease (all ERMS). In univariate analysis, EFS and OS were only associated with histology subtype, with 100% survival of known fusion-positive SRMS. RNA cluster expression showed three main clusters: ARMS, ERMS, and "VGLL2-fusion" cluster, consisting of SRMS and ERMS.

conclusionsBiopathology findings from this study support the different prognosis of infantile RMS. New fusion-positive SRMS has a very good outcome which may allow more conservative treatment in the future.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultBiomarkers, TumorChildChild, PreschoolCombined Modality TherapyFemaleFollow-Up StudiesFranceHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMaleOncogene Proteins, FusionPrognosisRetrospective StudiesBiomarkers, TumorOncogene Proteins, Fusioninfantsnewbornsrhabdoid tumorrhabdomyosarcomaspindle cell rhabdomyosarcomaVGLL2

Identifiers

PMID32087612
PMCPMC7163108
OpenAlexW3008682391

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.