Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32087343›Full record

ArticleAnnals of allergy, asthma & immunology : official publication of the American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology2020

Hypersensitivity to tetracyclines: Skin testing, graded challenge, and desensitization regimens.

Michelle C Maciag, Stephanie L Ward, Amy E O'Connell, Ana D Broyles

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of allergy, asthma & immunology : official publication of the American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Bimetallic urchin-like Au@Pt/SiOMikrochimica acta · 2026
    Article
  2. Global Burden of Drug-Induced Anaphylaxis Associated With 33 Classes of Antibiotics (1968-2024): A Pharmacovigilance Analysis.Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Michelle C MaciagDivision of Allergy and Immunology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. Electronic address: michelle.maciag@childrens.harvard.edu.
Stephanie L WardDivision of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Pediatrics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center and the University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio.
Amy E O'ConnellDepartment of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Division of Newborn Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Ana D BroylesDivision of Allergy and Immunology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.

Funding

MOLECULAR BASIS OF ALLERGIC AND IMMUNOLOGIC DISEASET32AI007512 · NIAID · CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL BOSTON · PI Janet Chou, Peter A Nigrovic · 1996 to 2026
$13.1M
NIAID NIH HHS T32 AI007512
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHypersensitivity reactions (HSRs) to tetracyclines and the related compound, tigecycline, can limit the use of these medications and compromise optimal patient care. Despite this, there is little discussion in the literature describing the presentation of these reactions or guiding clinicians on the management of these reactions in adult and pediatric patients.

objectiveTo describe the clinical features, optimal diagnostic approach, and management of HSRs to tetracyclines.

methodsPatients with reactions to tetracyclines at our institution from 2011 to 2019 were identified by retrospective chart review. Skin testing protocols were designed for each antibiotic. Graded challenge and desensitization procedures were devised based on medical history, skin testing results when available, and need for readministration.

resultsThe HSRs to tetracyclines, their workup, and management are described for 10 patients, aged 7 to 68 years. Our skin testing protocols for doxycycline, minocycline, and tigecycline described herein had good negative predictive value. When skin testing was negative and the initial reaction was not severe, graded challenge to the culprit drug was performed. Using the included procedures, 3 patients were desensitized to oral doxycycline, 3 to oral minocycline, and 2 to intravenous tigecycline. All the desensitizations were successful.

conclusionOnce identified, HSRs to tetracyclines can be further evaluated with skin testing and graded challenge and managed in appropriate cases with desensitization. These procedures can facilitate first-line therapy for patients who require tetracyclines but developed hypersensitivity reactions.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAnti-Bacterial AgentsChildDesensitization, ImmunologicDrug HypersensitivityFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSkin TestsTetracyclinesYoung AdultAnti-Bacterial AgentsTetracyclines

Identifiers

PMID32087343
PMCPMC7250719

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.