Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32087342›Full record

ArticleContemporary clinical trials2020

The SMARTER Trial: Design of a trial testing tailored mHealth feedback to impact self-monitoring of diet, physical activity, and weight.

Lora E Burke, Susan M Sereika, Bambang Parmanto, Britney Beatrice, Mia Cajita, India Loar, I Wayan Pulantara, Yuhan Wang, Jacob Kariuki, Yang Yu and 3 more

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Contemporary clinical trials, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Article
  12. Adherence to Behavioral Weight Management: A Scoping Review of Definitions, Measurement, and Components.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lora E BurkeUniversity of Pittsburgh, School of Nursing, Department of Health and Community Systems, Pittsburgh, PA, United States of America. Electronic address: lbu100@pitt.edu.
Susan M SereikaUniversity of Pittsburgh, School of Nursing, Department of Health and Community Systems, Pittsburgh, PA, United States of America.
Bambang ParmantoUniversity of Pittsburgh, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Pittsburgh, PA, United States of America.
Britney BeatriceUniversity of Pittsburgh, School of Nursing, Department of Health and Community Systems, Pittsburgh, PA, United States of America.
Mia CajitaUniversity of Pittsburgh, School of Nursing, Department of Health and Community Systems, Pittsburgh, PA, United States of America.
India LoarUniversity of Pittsburgh, School of Nursing, Department of Health and Community Systems, Pittsburgh, PA, United States of America.
I Wayan PulantaraUniversity of Pittsburgh, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Pittsburgh, PA, United States of America.
Yuhan WangUniversity of Pittsburgh, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Pittsburgh, PA, United States of America.
Jacob KariukiUniversity of Pittsburgh, School of Nursing, Department of Health and Community Systems, Pittsburgh, PA, United States of America.
Yang YuUniversity of Pittsburgh, School of Nursing, Department of Health and Community Systems, Pittsburgh, PA, United States of America.
Maribel CedilloUniversity of Utah, School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, United States of America.
Jessica ChengUniversity of Pittsburgh, Graduate School of Public Health, Department of Epidemiology, Pittsburgh, PA, United States of America.
Molly B ConroyUniversity of Utah, School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, United States of America.
University of Pittsburgh · USUniversity of Utah · US

Funding

Promoting Lifestyle Change via Tailored mHealth To Improve Health, HL131583R01HL131583 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI BURKE, LORA EMILIE, CONROY, MARGARET B · 2017 to 2020
$3.1M
Promoting Real World Implementation of an Evidence-Based Weight Management Intervention in Primary CareR18DK123372 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI CONROY, MARGARET B, KAWAMOTO, KENSAKU · 2020 to 2024
$3.1M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL131583NIDDK NIH HHS R18 DK123372
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSelf-monitoring food intake and physical activity (PA) is positively related to weight loss and the addition of feedback (FB) messages has been shown to reinforce behavior change. Moreover, the more immediate the delivery of reinforcing FB messages, the more likely they will promote the desired behaviors. PURPOSE: Describe design and rationale of SMARTER, a National Institute of Heart, Lung, and Blood (NHLBI)-sponsored randomized, controlled trial, which compares the differential efficacy of two weight loss treatments among 530 adults, ages 18 and older.

methodsSingle-site, 2-group design trial with subjects randomized 1:1 to either: 1) self-monitoring (SM), where participants self-monitor diet, PA, and weight using a commercial smartphone application (app); or 2) SM + FB, where participants self-monitor and receive real-time, tailored feedback (FB) as pop-up messages up to 3 times/day for 12 months. Daily FB messages address diet and PA behaviors and a weekly FB message addresses self-weighing. We hypothesize that subjects assigned to SM + FB will show greater weight loss at 6 and 12 months and greater sustained engagement in the program than the SM group, measured by adherence to the study's lifestyle and SM protocol. We will explore temporal relationships of the frequency, timing, and type of FB delivered and subsequent lifestyle behaviors through examination of serially collected real-time SM (diet, PA, weight) data over 12 months.

conclusionsIf efficacious, this fully scalable intervention could be efficiently translated and disseminated to reach large numbers of individuals through commercial apps at lower cost than existing in-person weight loss programs.

Indexed as

FeedbackHealthy LifestyleMobile ApplicationsBlood PressureBody Mass IndexBody Weights and MeasuresDietExerciseFitness TrackersHealth PromotionHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicReminder SystemsResearch DesignSelf CareSelf EfficacyAdultsClinical trial.gov #: NCT03367936Electronic diaryFeedbackmHealthObesityPhysical activity trackerRandomized controlled trialSelf-monitoringSmartphoneTechnologyWeight lossWi-fi scale

Identifiers

PMID32087342
PMCPMC7269678
OpenAlexW3007149107

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.