ReviewJournal of neuroscience methods2020
An emerging method to noninvasively measure and identify vagal response markers to enable bioelectronic control of gastroparesis symptoms with gastric electrical stimulation.
Review in Journal of neuroscience methods, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06783504 (Effect Of Percutaneous Electrical Nerve Field Stimulation), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Effect Of Percutaneous Electrical Nerve Field Stimulation (PENFS) On Symptom Control And Autonomic Nervous System Activity In Patients With Diabetes Mellitus
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Accelerating the development of bioelectronic medicine: outcomes and innovations from the NIH SPARC initiative.Bioelectronic medicine · 2026Review
- Neural Gastric Electrical Stimulation: Future Prospects in Managing Gastric Emptying Disorders.Journal of neurogastroenterology and motility · 2026Review
- Next generation bioelectronic medicine: making the case for non-invasive closed-loop autonomic neuromodulation.Bioelectronic medicine · 2025Review
- Laterality, sexual dimorphism, and human vagal projectome heterogeneity shape neuromodulation to vagus nerve stimulation.Communications biology · 2024Article
- Computational models of compound nerve action potentials: Efficient filter-based methods to quantify effects of tissue conductivities, conduction distance, and nerve fiber parameters.PLoS computational biology · 2024Article
- A global bibliometric and visualized analysis of the status and trends of gastroparesis research.European journal of medical research · 2023Review
- Neuromodulation for functional upper gastrointestinal diseases.Gut microbiota and integrative wellness · 2023Article
- Recent Progress in Materials Chemistry to Advance Flexible Bioelectronics in Medicine.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2022Review
- Computational modelling of nerve stimulation and recording with peripheral visceral neural interfaces.Journal of neural engineering · 2021Article
- Divergence of neuroimmune circuits activated by afferent and efferent vagal nerve stimulation in the regulation of inflammation.The Journal of physiology · 2021Article
- Strategies to Refine Gastric Stimulation and Pacing Protocols: Experimental and Modeling Approaches.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundGastric electrical stimulation (GES) can be a life-changing, device-based treatment option for drug-resistant nausea and vomiting associated with diabetic or idiopathic gastroparesis (GP). Despite over two decades of clinical use, the mechanism of action remains unclear. We hypothesize a vagal mechanism. NEW
methodHere, we describe a noninvasive method to investigate vagal nerve involvement in GES therapy in 66 human subjects through the compound nerve action potential (CNAP).
resultsOf the 66 subjects, 28 had diabetic GP, 35 had idiopathic GP, and 3 had postsurgical GP. Stimulus charge per pulse did not predict treatment efficacy, but did predict a significant increase in total symptom score in type 1 diabetics as GES stimulus charge per pulse increased (p < 0.01), representing a notable side effect and providing a method to identify it. In contrast, the number of significant left and right vagal fiber responses that were recorded directly related to patient symptom improvement. Increased vagal responses correlated with significant decreases in total symptom score (p < 0.05). COMPARISON WITH EXISTING METHOD(S): We have developed transcutaneous recording of cervical vagal activity that is synchronized with GES in conscious human subjects, along with methods of discriminating the activity of different nerve fiber groups with respect to conduction speed and treatment response.
conclusionsCutaneous vagal CNAP analysis is a useful technique to unmask relationships among GES parameters, vagal recruitment, efficacy and side-effect management. Our results suggest that CNAP-guided GES optimization will provide the most benefit to patients with idiopathic and type 1 diabetic gastroparesis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.