Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32087172›Full record

ArticleThe Lancet. Global health2020

Association between ethnicity and under-5 mortality: analysis of data from demographic surveys from 36 low-income and middle-income countries.

Cesar G Victora, Aluisio J D Barros, Cauane Blumenberg, Janaina Calu Costa, Luis Paulo Vidaletti, Fernando C Wehrmeister, Bruno Masquelier, Lucia Hug, Danzhen You

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Lancet. Global health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
11.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Cesar G VictoraInternational Center for Equity in Health, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, Brazil. Electronic address: cvictora@gmail.com.
Aluisio J D BarrosInternational Center for Equity in Health, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, Brazil.
Cauane BlumenbergInternational Center for Equity in Health, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, Brazil.
Janaina Calu CostaInternational Center for Equity in Health, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, Brazil.
Luis Paulo VidalettiInternational Center for Equity in Health, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, Brazil.
Fernando C WehrmeisterInternational Center for Equity in Health, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, Brazil.
Bruno MasquelierCentre de Recherche en Démographie, Université Catholique de Louvain, Louvain, Belgium.
Lucia HugDivision of Data, Analytics, Planning and Monitoring, UNICEF, New York, NY, USA.
Danzhen YouDivision of Data, Analytics, Planning and Monitoring, UNICEF, New York, NY, USA.
Universidade Federal de Pelotas · BRUnited Nations Children's Fund · USUCLouvain · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) call for stratification of social indicators by ethnic groups; however, no recent multicountry analyses on ethnicity and child survival have been done in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs).

methodsWe used data from Demographic and Health Surveys and Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys collected between 2010 and 2016, from LMICs that provided birth histories and information on ethnicity or a proxy variable. We calculated neonatal (age 0-27 days), post-neonatal (age 28-364 days), child (age 1-4 years), and under-5 mortality rates (U5MRs) for each ethnic group within each country. We assessed differences in mortality between ethnic groups using a likelihood ratio test, Theil's index, and between-group variance. We used multivariable analyses of U5MR by ethnicity to adjust for household wealth, maternal education, and urban-rural residence.

findingsWe included data from 36 LMICs, which included 2 812 381 livebirths among 415 ethnic groups. In 25 countries, significant differences in U5MR by ethnic group were identified (all p<0·05 likelihood ratio test). In these countries, the median mortality ratio between the ethnic groups with the highest and lowest U5MRs was 3·3 (IQR 2·1-5·2; range 1·5-8·5), whereas among the remaining 11 countries, the median U5MR ratio was 1·9 (IQR 1·7-2·5; range 1·4-10·0). Ethnic gaps were wider for child mortality than for neonatal or post-neonatal mortality. In nearly all countries, adjustment for wealth, education, and place of residence did not affect ethnic gaps in mortality, with the exception of Guatemala, India, Laos, and Nigeria. The largest ethnic group did not have the lowest U5MR in any of the countries studied.

interpretationSignificant ethnic disparities in child survival were identified in more than two-thirds of the countries studied. Regular analyses of ethnic disparities are essential for monitoring trends, targeting, and assessing the impact of health interventions. Such analyses will contribute to the effort towards leaving no one behind, which is at the centre of the SDGs.

fundingBill & Melinda Gates Foundation, UNICEF, Wellcome Trust, Associação Brasileira de Saúde Coletiva.

Indexed as

Health Status DisparitiesChild MortalityChild, PreschoolDemographyDeveloping CountriesEthnicityHumansInfantInfant MortalityInfant, Newborn

Identifiers

PMID32087172
PMCPMC7034191
OpenAlexW3008851948

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.