Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32087126›Full record

Trial reportLancet (London, England)2020

Daily emollient during infancy for prevention of eczema: the BEEP randomised controlled trial.

Joanne R Chalmers, Rachel H Haines, Lucy E Bradshaw, Alan A Montgomery, Kim S Thomas, Sara J Brown, Matthew J Ridd, Sandra Lawton, Eric L Simpson, Michael J Cork and 12 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled TrialPragmatic Clinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Lancet (London, England), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04680520 (A Randomised Controlled Trial to Determine Whether Application of Emollient From Birth Can Prevent Eczema in High Risk Children.), which is not on this map. Cited by 105 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
105citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
29.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04680520 nacompletednot on this map

A Randomised Controlled Trial to Determine Whether Application of Emollient From Birth Can Prevent Eczema in High Risk Children.

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of NottinghamRan2014 to 2022Enrolled1,394ConditionsEczemaArmsExperimental (Doublebase Gel® or Diprobase Cream®), Best practice skin care advice booklet
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

105 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 296 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Skin care interventions in infants for preventing eczema and food allergy.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Skin care interventions in infants for preventing eczema and food allergy.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Emollient application from birth to prevent eczema in high-risk children: the BEEP RCT.Health technology assessment (Winchester, England) · 2024
    Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Atopic dermatitis.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2026
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

45 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 11 institutions in 2 countries.

Joanne R ChalmersCentre of Evidence Based Dermatology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Rachel H HainesNottingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Lucy E BradshawNottingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Alan A MontgomeryNottingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Kim S ThomasCentre of Evidence Based Dermatology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Sara J BrownSkin Research Group, School of Medicine, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK; Department of Dermatology, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee, UK.
Matthew J RiddPopulation Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Sandra LawtonRotherham NHS Foundation Trust, UK.
Eric L SimpsonDepartment of Dermatology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
Michael J CorkSheffield Dermatology Research, Department of Infection and Immunity, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Tracey H SachHealth Economics Group, Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, UK.
Carsten FlohrUnit for Population-Based Dermatology Research, St John's Institute of Dermatology, Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust and King's College London, London, UK.
Eleanor J MitchellNottingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Richard SwindenNottingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Stella TarrNottingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Susan Davies-JonesCentre of Evidence Based Dermatology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Nicola JaySheffield Children's Hospital, Sheffield, UK.
Maeve M KelleherNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Michael R PerkinSt George's, University of London, London, UK.
Robert J BoyleCentre of Evidence Based Dermatology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK; National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Hywel C WilliamsCentre of Evidence Based Dermatology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK. Electronic address: hywel.williams@nottingham.ac.uk.
BEEP study team
University of Nottingham · GBImperial College London · GBKing's College London · GBOregon Health & Science University · USSheffield Children's Hospital · GBSt George's, University of London · GBThe Rotherham NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Bristol · GBUniversity of Dundee · GBUniversity of East Anglia · GBUniversity of Sheffield · GB

Funding

Department of Health CDF-2014-07-037Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSkin barrier dysfunction precedes eczema development. We tested whether daily use of emollient in the first year could prevent eczema in high-risk children.

methodsWe did a multicentre, pragmatic, parallel-group, randomised controlled trial in 12 hospitals and four primary care sites across the UK. Families were approached via antenatal or postnatal services for recruitment of term infants (at least 37 weeks' gestation) at high risk of developing eczema (ie, at least one first-degree relative with parent-reported eczema, allergic rhinitis, or asthma, diagnosed by a doctor). Term newborns with a family history of atopic disease were randomly assigned (1:1) to application of emollient daily (either Diprobase cream or DoubleBase gel) for the first year plus standard skin-care advice (emollient group) or standard skin-care advice only (control group). The randomisation schedule was created using computer-generated code (stratified by recruiting centre and number of first-degree relatives with atopic disease) and participants were assigned to groups using an internet-based randomisation system. The primary outcome was eczema at age 2 years (defined by UK working party criteria) with analysis as randomised regardless of adherence to allocation for participants with outcome data collected, and adjusting for stratification variables. This trial is registered with ISRCTN, ISRCTN21528841. Data collection for long-term follow-up is ongoing, but the trial is closed to recruitment.

findings1394 newborns were randomly assigned to study groups between Nov 19, 2014, and Nov 18, 2016; 693 were assigned to the emollient group and 701 to the control group. Adherence in the emollient group was 88% (466 of 532) at 3 months, 82% (427 of 519) at 6 months, and 74% (375 of 506) at 12 months in those with complete questionnaire data. At age 2 years, eczema was present in 139 (23%) of 598 infants with outcome data collected in the emollient group and 150 (25%) of 612 infants in the control group (adjusted relative risk 0·95 [95% CI 0·78 to 1·16], p=0·61; adjusted risk difference -1·2% [-5·9 to 3·6]). Other eczema definitions supported the results of the primary analysis. Mean number of skin infections per child in year 1 was 0·23 (SD 0·68) in the emollient group versus 0·15 (0·46) in the control group; adjusted incidence rate ratio 1·55 (95% CI 1·15 to 2·09).

interpretationWe found no evidence that daily emollient during the first year of life prevents eczema in high-risk children and some evidence to suggest an increased risk of skin infections. Our study shows that families with eczema, asthma, or allergic rhinitis should not use daily emollients to try and prevent eczema in their newborn.

fundingNational Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment.

Indexed as

Dermatitis, AtopicDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug Administration ScheduleEczemaEmollientsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMaleReference ValuesRisk AssessmentTreatment OutcomeUnited KingdomEmollients

Identifiers

PMID32087126
PMCPMC7086156
OpenAlexW3009019417

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.