Trial reportLancet (London, England)2020
Daily emollient during infancy for prevention of eczema: the BEEP randomised controlled trial.
Trial report in Lancet (London, England), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04680520 (A Randomised Controlled Trial to Determine Whether Application of Emollient From Birth Can Prevent Eczema in High Risk Children.), which is not on this map. Cited by 105 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Randomised Controlled Trial to Determine Whether Application of Emollient From Birth Can Prevent Eczema in High Risk Children.
Who cites it
105 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 296 citations in OpenAlex.
- Skin care interventions in infants for preventing eczema and food allergy.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022Pooled it
- Topical emollient application in term healthy newborns: A systematic review.Journal of global health · 2022Pooled it
- Skin care interventions in infants for preventing eczema and food allergy.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021Pooled it
- Resilience of the Skin Microbiome in Atopic Dermatitis During Short-Term Topical Treatment.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Trial
- Emollient application from birth to prevent eczema in high-risk children: the BEEP RCT.Health technology assessment (Winchester, England) · 2024Trial
- Comparison of lotions, creams, gels and ointments for the treatment of childhood eczema: the BEE RCT.Health technology assessment (Winchester, England) · 2023Trial
- Effects of Early Emollient Use in Children at High Risk of Atopic Dermatitis: A German Pilot Study.Acta dermato-venereologica · 2023Trial
- Trial
- The positive effect of mother-performed infant massage on infantile eczema and maternal mental state: A randomized controlled trial.Frontiers in public health · 2022Trial
- Moisturisers from birth in at-risk infants of atopic dermatitis - a pragmatic randomised controlled trial.The Australasian journal of dermatology · 2021Trial
- Association of frequent moisturizer use in early infancy with the development of food allergy.The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology · 2021Trial
- Trial of food allergy IgE tests for Eczema Relief (TIGER): study protocol.Skin health and disease · 2026Article
- Evidence strength of exposure-outcome associations in pediatric allergic diseases: an umbrella review of meta-analyses.Pediatric research · 2026Review
- TRANS-FOODS study protocol: an observer-blinded, randomized controlled study to assess transcutaneous sensitization to peanut protein in adults with and without atopic dermatitis.Skin health and disease · 2026Article
- Management of Infected, Non-Responsive Atopic Dermatitis in a Romanian Center.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Divergent Paths: A Comprehensive Review of Mechanisms and Clinical Implications in Atopic Dermatitis and Psoriasis.Allergy · 2026Review
- Atopic dermatitis/eczema phenotypes and their association with food allergy: a nationwide birth cohort study in Japan.European journal of pediatrics · 2026Article
- Atopic dermatitis.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2026Review
- Patient and public involvement (PPI) reporting in maternal and neonatal clinical trials: an exploratory review.Trials · 2026Review
- Article
45 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
22 authors at 11 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSkin barrier dysfunction precedes eczema development. We tested whether daily use of emollient in the first year could prevent eczema in high-risk children.
methodsWe did a multicentre, pragmatic, parallel-group, randomised controlled trial in 12 hospitals and four primary care sites across the UK. Families were approached via antenatal or postnatal services for recruitment of term infants (at least 37 weeks' gestation) at high risk of developing eczema (ie, at least one first-degree relative with parent-reported eczema, allergic rhinitis, or asthma, diagnosed by a doctor). Term newborns with a family history of atopic disease were randomly assigned (1:1) to application of emollient daily (either Diprobase cream or DoubleBase gel) for the first year plus standard skin-care advice (emollient group) or standard skin-care advice only (control group). The randomisation schedule was created using computer-generated code (stratified by recruiting centre and number of first-degree relatives with atopic disease) and participants were assigned to groups using an internet-based randomisation system. The primary outcome was eczema at age 2 years (defined by UK working party criteria) with analysis as randomised regardless of adherence to allocation for participants with outcome data collected, and adjusting for stratification variables. This trial is registered with ISRCTN, ISRCTN21528841. Data collection for long-term follow-up is ongoing, but the trial is closed to recruitment.
findings1394 newborns were randomly assigned to study groups between Nov 19, 2014, and Nov 18, 2016; 693 were assigned to the emollient group and 701 to the control group. Adherence in the emollient group was 88% (466 of 532) at 3 months, 82% (427 of 519) at 6 months, and 74% (375 of 506) at 12 months in those with complete questionnaire data. At age 2 years, eczema was present in 139 (23%) of 598 infants with outcome data collected in the emollient group and 150 (25%) of 612 infants in the control group (adjusted relative risk 0·95 [95% CI 0·78 to 1·16], p=0·61; adjusted risk difference -1·2% [-5·9 to 3·6]). Other eczema definitions supported the results of the primary analysis. Mean number of skin infections per child in year 1 was 0·23 (SD 0·68) in the emollient group versus 0·15 (0·46) in the control group; adjusted incidence rate ratio 1·55 (95% CI 1·15 to 2·09).
interpretationWe found no evidence that daily emollient during the first year of life prevents eczema in high-risk children and some evidence to suggest an increased risk of skin infections. Our study shows that families with eczema, asthma, or allergic rhinitis should not use daily emollients to try and prevent eczema in their newborn.
fundingNational Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.