Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32087048›Full record

ArticleBiotechnology progress2020

A novel approach to evaluate ELISA antibody coverage of host cell proteins-combining ELISA-based immunocapture and mass spectrometry.

Katrine Pilely, Solveig B Nielsen, Anette Draborg, Maiken L Henriksen, Søren W K Hansen, Lars Skriver, Ejvind Mørtz, Rikke R Lund

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biotechnology progress, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Other Techniques.Advances in biochemical engineering/biotechnology · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Katrine PilelyAlphalyse A/S, Odense, Denmark.
Solveig B NielsenAlphalyse A/S, Odense, Denmark.
Anette DraborgAlphalyse A/S, Odense, Denmark.
Maiken L HenriksenInstitute of Molecular Medicine, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Søren W K HansenInstitute of Molecular Medicine, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Lars SkriverSavara ApS, Hørsholm, Denmark.
Ejvind MørtzAlphalyse A/S, Odense, Denmark.
Rikke R LundAlphalyse A/S, Odense, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-0322-892X
Odense Municipality · DKUniversity of Southern Denmark · DKSavara (Denmark) · DK

Funding

Eurostars E10980 SaferBIOPHARMA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Monitoring host cell proteins (HCPs) is one of the most important analytical requirements in production of recombinant biopharmaceuticals to ensure product purity and patient safety. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) is the standard method for monitoring HCP clearance. It is important to validate that the critical reagent of an ELISA, the HCP antibody, covers a broad spectrum of the HCPs potentially present in the purified drug substance. Current coverage methods for assessing HCP antibody coverage are based on 2D-Western blot or immunoaffinity-purification combined with 2D gel electrophoresis and have several limitations. In the present study, we present a novel coverage method combining ELISA-based immunocapture with protein identification by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS): ELISA-MS. ELISA-MS is used to accurately determine HCP coverage of an early process sample by three commercially available anti-Escherichia coli HCP antibodies, evading the limitations of current methods for coverage analysis, and taking advantage of the benefits of MS analysis. The results obtained comprise a list of individual HCPs covered by each HCP antibody. The novel method shows high sensitivity, high reproducibility, and enables tight control of nonspecific binding through inclusion of a species-specific isotype control antibody. We propose that ELISA-MS will be a valuable supplement to existing coverage methods or even a replacement. ELISA-MS will increase the possibility of selecting the best HCP ELISA, thus improving HCP surveillance and resulting in a final HCP profile with the lowest achievable risk. Overall, this will be beneficial to both the pharmaceutical industry and patient safety.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntibodies, MonoclonalCHO CellsChromatography, LiquidCricetinaeCricetulusEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayHumansProteinsSpecies SpecificityTandem Mass SpectrometryAntibodies, MonoclonalProteinsbiopharmaceuticalscoverage analysisELISA-MShost cell proteinreagent characterization

Identifiers

PMID32087048
PMCPMC7507178
OpenAlexW3008807833

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.