Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32086880›Full record

ArticleVeterinary medicine and science2020

Risk factors and spatial relative risk assessment for influenza A virus in poultry and swine in backyard production systems of central Chile.

Nicolas Bravo-Vasquez, Cecilia Baumberger, Pedro Jimenez-Bluhm, Francisca Di Pillo, Andres Lazo, Juan Sanhueza, Stacey Schultz-Cherry, Christopher Hamilton-West

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary medicine and science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Risk Factors for Positivity to Shiga Toxin-ProducingInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  12. Screening the Presence of Non-TyphoidalAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Nicolas Bravo-VasquezDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Saint Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA.
Cecilia BaumbergerDepartment of Preventive Veterinary Medicine, University of Chile, Santiago de Chile, Chile.
Pedro Jimenez-BluhmDepartment of Preventive Veterinary Medicine, University of Chile, Santiago de Chile, Chile.
Francisca Di PilloNúcleo de Investigaciones Aplicadas en Ciencias Veterinarias y Agronómicas, Universidad de Las Americas, Santiago, Chile.ORCID 0000-0001-6662-0323
Andres LazoDepartment of Preventive Veterinary Medicine, University of Chile, Santiago de Chile, Chile.
Juan SanhuezaDepartment of Veterinary Population Medicine, University of Minnesota Twin Cities, St Paul, MN, USA.
Stacey Schultz-CherryDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Saint Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA.
Christopher Hamilton-WestDepartment of Preventive Veterinary Medicine, University of Chile, Santiago de Chile, Chile.ORCID 0000-0002-5609-2237

Funding

National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases HHSN272201400006NIAID NIH HHS HHSN272201400006C
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Backyard production systems (BPS) are a common form of poultry and swine production worldwide. The limited implementation of biosecurity standards in these operations makes BPS a potential source for the emergence of pathogens that have an impact on both animal and public health. Information regarding circulation of influenza A virus (IAV) in poultry and swine raised in BPS is scarce; particularly in South American countries. The objective of this study was to estimate prevalence and seroprevalence of IAV in BPS in central Chile, identify subtype diversity, evaluate risk factors and spatial relative risk for IAV. Samples were collected from 329 BPS from central Chile. Seroprevalence at BPS level was 34.7% (95% CI: 23.1%-46.2%), 19.7% (95% CI: 9.9%-30.6%) and 11.7% (95% CI: 7.2%-16.4%), whereas prevalence at BPS level was 4.2% (95% CI: 0.0%-8.8%), 8.2% (95% CI: 0.8%-14.0%) and 9.2% (95% CI: 4.8%-13.1%), for the Metropolitan, Valparaiso and LGB O'Higgins regions, respectively. Spatial analysis revealed that central-western area of Metropolitan region and the southern province of Valparaiso region could be considered as high-risk areas for IAV (spatial relative risk = 2.2, p < .05). Logistic regression models identified the practice of breeding both poultry and pigs at the BPS as a risk factor (95% CI 1.06-3.75). From 75 IAV ELISA-positive sera, 20 chicken sera had haemagglutination inhibition titres ranging from 20 to 160, and of these, 11 had microneutralization titres ranging from 40 to 960 for one or more IAV subtypes. Identified subtypes were H1, H3, H4, H9, H10 and H12. Results from this study highlight the need for further IAV surveillance programmes in BPS in Chile. Early detection of IAV strains circulating in backyard animals, especially in regions with large human populations, could have an enormous impact on animal and public health.

Indexed as

Animal HusbandryAnimalsChickensChileDucksGeeseInfluenza A virusInfluenza in BirdsOrthomyxoviridae InfectionsPoultry DiseasesPrevalenceRiskRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsSeroepidemiologic StudiesSus scrofabackyard production systemsChileinfluenza A virusspatial risksurveillancezoonosis

Identifiers

PMID32086880
PMCPMC7397882

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.