Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32086799›Full record

ReviewClinical genetics2020

Consequences of epigenetic derepression in facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy.

Anna Greco, Remko Goossens, Baziel van Engelen, Silvère M van der Maarel

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical genetics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Deciphering Facioscapulohumeral Dystrophy in the clinical trials era: where are we now?Acta myologica : myopathies and cardiomyopathies : official journal of the Mediterranean Society of Myology · 2025
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Influence ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Cells · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Anna GrecoDepartment of Neurology, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Remko GoossensDepartment of Human Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-8829-4378
Baziel van EngelenDepartment of Neurology, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-9867-9047
Silvère M van der MaarelDepartment of Human Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8103-711X
Leiden University Medical Center · NLRadboud University Nijmegen · NL

Funding

The Pathogenesis of Facioscapulohumeral Muscular DystrophyP01NS069539 · NINDS · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI TAWIL, RABI · 2010 to 2019
$12.3M
NINDS NIH HHS P01 NS069539
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD), a common hereditary myopathy, is caused either by the contraction of the D4Z4 macrosatellite repeat at the distal end of chromosome 4q to a size of 1 to 10 repeat units (FSHD1) or by mutations in D4Z4 chromatin modifiers such as Structural Maintenance of Chromosomes Hinge Domain Containing 1 (FSHD2). These two genotypes share a phenotype characterized by progressive and often asymmetric muscle weakening and atrophy, and common epigenetic alterations of the D4Z4 repeat. All together, these epigenetic changes converge the two genetic forms into one disease and explain the derepression of the DUX4 gene, which is otherwise kept epigenetically silent in skeletal muscle. DUX4 is consistently transcriptionally upregulated in FSHD1 and FSHD2 skeletal muscle cells where it is believed to exercise a toxic effect. Here we provide a review of the recent literature describing the progress in understanding the complex genetic and epigenetic architecture of FSHD, with a focus on one of the consequences that these epigenetic changes inflict, the DUX4-induced immune deregulation cascade. Moreover, we review the latest therapeutic strategies, with particular attention to the potential of epigenetic correction of the FSHD locus.

Indexed as

Chromosomes, Human, Pair 4Epigenesis, GeneticGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHomeodomain ProteinsHumansMuscle, SkeletalMuscular Dystrophy, FacioscapulohumeralMutationDUX4L1 protein, humanHomeodomain ProteinsDUX4Epigeneticsfacioscapulohumeralgenetic diseasesgeneticsimmune deregulationinbornmuscular dystrophySMCHD1

Identifiers

PMID32086799
PMCPMC7318180
OpenAlexW3008857052

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.