Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32086792›Full record

ReviewDrugs & aging2020

Atopic Dermatitis in Older Adults: A Review of Treatment Options.

Ryoji Tanei

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Drugs & aging, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
7.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 79 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. IL-31/33 Axis in Atopic Dermatitis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Controlled Release of Madecassoside and Asiaticoside ofMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  17. Hormonal interventions in skin wounds - a mini review.Molecular medicine (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2024
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Topical steroids or emollients: does order matter?Archives of dermatological research · 2024
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ryoji TaneiDepartment of Dermatology, Tokyo Metropolitan Geriatric Hospital and Institute of Gerontology, 35-2 Sakaecho, Itabashi, Tokyo, 173-0015, Japan. rtanei@aol.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3774-2561
Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Gerontology · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Atopic dermatitis (AD) in older adults (elderly AD) has recently emerged as a newly defined subgroup of AD. When selecting treatment options, clinical characteristics of elderly AD and age-specific factors of older patients must be considered. As in other age groups, regular application of moisturizers in combination with topical corticosteroids and calcineurin inhibitors, adjunctive administration of oral antihistamines/anti-allergic drugs, and avoidance of exacerbating factors comprise basic treatments for elderly AD. For moderate-to-severe cases and/or in those with a decreased ability to use topical treatments, powerful anti-inflammatory treatments may become necessary as additional treatment options. While low-dose oral corticosteroids may be useful for cases of elderly AD, careful attention should be paid to adverse effects. Oral cyclosporine (ciclosporin) is less commonly used due to the increased risk of malignancy and organ toxicity in older patients with AD. Narrow-band ultraviolet B phototherapy may also be useful for older patients, although the necessity of frequent hospital visits for irradiation therapy may become a burden of disease for such patients. As a biologic, dupilumab therapy markedly improves skin lesions and itch in older patients with AD, with a rapid response and non-serious adverse effects. Nevertheless, injection pain, expensive medical care, and regular follow-up every 2 weeks are disadvantages of dupilumab therapy. Therefore, clinicians must prioritize individualized treatment options that will reduce the burden of disease for cases of elderly AD.

Indexed as

Administration, TopicalAgedDermatitis, AtopicHumansSafety

Identifiers

PMID32086792
PMCPMC7044141
OpenAlexW3007742275

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.