ArticleDrugs & aging2020
Safety and Efficacy of Naldemedine for the Treatment of Opioid-Induced Constipation in Patients with Chronic Non-Cancer Pain Receiving Opioid Therapy: A Subgroup Analysis of Patients ≥ 65 Years of Age.
Article in Drugs & aging, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel-group Study of Naldemedine in the Treatment of Opioid-induced Constipation in Subjects With Non-malignant Chronic Pain Receiving Opioid Therapy
A Randomized Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel-group, Multicenter, Phase 3 Study to Evaluate the Long-term Safety of Naldemedine for the Treatment of Opioid-induced Constipation in Subjects With Non-malignant Chronic Pain Receiving Opioid Therapy
A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel-group Study of Naldemedine in the Treatment of Opioid-induced Constipation in Subjects With Non-malignant Chronic Pain Receiving Opioid Therapy
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Executive summary of the guideline for prescribing opioid analgesics for chronic non-cancer pain (third edition) by the Japan Society of Pain Clinicians.Journal of anesthesia · 2025Guideline
- SuperbugCurrent topics in medicinal chemistry · 2025Article
- A Systematic Review of Naldemedine and Naloxegol for the Treatment of Opioid-Induced Constipation in Cancer Patients.Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- A Retrospective Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Naldemedine for Treatment of Opioid-Induced Constipation in Patients with Hepatobiliary Pancreatic Cancer.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2023Article
- A retrospective study of the efficacy and safety of naldemedine for opioid-induced constipation in thoracic cancer patients.Thoracic cancer · 2022Article
- Efficacy and Safety of Naldemedine for Patients with Cancer with Opioid-Induced Constipation in Clinical Practice: A Real-World Retrospective Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- The Involvement of the Endogenous Opioid System in the Gastrointestinal Aging in Mice and Humans.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Update on the role of naldemedine in opioid-induced constipation in patients with chronic noncancer pain.Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology · 2022Review
- Real-World Patient Characteristics and Treatment Patterns of Naldemedine for the Treatment of Opioid-Induced Constipation in Patients with Cancer: A Multicenter Retrospective Chart Review Study.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2021Article
- Review
- Insights into the Use of Peripherally Acting μ-Opioid Receptor Antagonists (PAMORAs) in Oncologic Patients: from Scientific Evidence to Real Clinical Practice.Current treatment options in oncology · 2021Review
- Naldemedine: A New Option for OIBD.Journal of pain research · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOpioid-induced constipation (OIC), the most common side effect of opioid treatment, is under-recognized and undertreated in older patients. Naldemedine, an oral, peripherally acting μ-opioid receptor antagonist (PAMORA), is approved in Japan, the United States, and the European Union for treatment of OIC in adult patients.
objectiveThis integrated analysis of three phase 3 trials (COMPOSE-1, COMPOSE-2, and COMPOSE-3) evaluated the safety and efficacy of naldemedine for up to 12 weeks in a subgroup of patients aged ≥ 65 years.
methodsPatients aged 18-80 years with chronic non-cancer pain for ≥ 3 months (treated with opioids for ≥ 3 months in COMPOSE-1 and COMPOSE-2) and OIC received oral naldemedine 0.2 mg or placebo once daily. Safety assessments included overall incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), TEAEs in the gastrointestinal disorders System Organ Class, and TEAEs of opioid withdrawal or possible opioid withdrawal. Efficacy was based on the proportion of responders in COMPOSE-1 and COMPOSE-2, defined as having ≥ 3 spontaneous bowel movements/week and a ≥ 1-spontaneous bowel movement/week increase from baseline for ≥ 9 of 12 weeks and ≥ 3 of the last 4 weeks.
resultsA total of 14.8% (344/2328) of patients were aged ≥ 65 years in all studies. The incidence of TEAEs in naldemedine-treated patients aged ≥ 65 years (45.9%) was comparable to that in patients aged ≥ 65 years receiving placebo (51.6%) and in the overall naldemedine group (47.1%). The incidence of gastrointestinal disorders System Organ Class TEAEs in naldemedine-treated patients aged ≥ 65 years (20.2%) was also comparable to that in patients aged ≥ 65 years receiving placebo (16.1%) and in the overall naldemedine group (21.8%). The incidence of TEAEs of opioid withdrawal with naldemedine was 1.1% in patients aged ≥ 65 years and 1.0% overall, and the incidence of TEAEs of possible opioid withdrawal was 1.1% in patients aged ≥ 65 years and 1.7% overall. The proportion of responders was higher in naldemedine-treated patients versus placebo, both overall (50.1% vs 34.1%; p < 0.0001) and in those aged ≥ 65 years (51.8% vs 37.6%).
conclusionsThis integrated analysis confirmed that OIC treatment with naldemedine 0.2 mg was generally well tolerated and effective in patients aged ≥ 65 years with chronic non-cancer pain. Safety and efficacy results were consistent with the overall patient population. CLINICALTRIALS. GOV REGISTRATION: NCT01965158, NCT01993940, NCT01965652.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.