ArticleJournal of abnormal child psychology2020
Multi-Faceted Constructs in Abnormal Psychology: Implications of the Bifactor S - 1 Model for Individual Clinical Assessment.
Article in Journal of abnormal child psychology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Measuring the dark triad: a meta-analytical SEM study of two prominent short scales.Frontiers in psychology · 2024Pooled it
- Transdiagnostic and symptom-domain associations between mental illnesses and future self-connectedness versus future self-valence.JCPP advances · 2026Article
- Article
- Mechanisms of change in naturalistic mental health care settings: study protocol for a longitudinal multimethod study.BMJ open · 2025Article
- How personality functioning relates to psychological distress and behavioral attitudes during the Covid-19 pandemic.European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience · 2025Article
- Development of the psychopathological vulnerability index for screening at-risk youths: a Rasch model approach.Npj mental health research · 2024Article
- Examining the role of personality functioning in a hierarchical taxonomy of psychopathology using two years of ambulatory assessed data.Translational psychiatry · 2024Article
- Domain-Specific Greed.Personality & social psychology bulletin · 2024Article
- Associations Between Reward and Future-Related Orientations and General and Specific Mental Health Issues in Adolescence.Research on child and adolescent psychopathology · 2024Article
- The dimensional structure of internalizing psychopathology: Relation to diagnostic categories.Clinical psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2023Article
- Processing Speed is Related to the General Psychopathology Factor in Youth.Research on child and adolescent psychopathology · 2023Article
- On the Meaning of the "Assessment · 2023Article
- Portuguese Physical Literacy Assessment for adolescents (15-18 years): validation using confirmatory factor and composite analyses.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2023Article
- What Accounts for the Factors of Psychopathology? An Investigation of the Neurocognitive Correlates of Internalising, Externalising, and theBrain sciences · 2022Article
- Exploring the Dimensionality of the Social Skills Improvement System Using Exploratory Graph Analysis and Bifactor-(Assessment · 2022Article
- Application of S-1 Bifactor Model to Evaluate the Structural Validity of TMMS-24.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- Going "Up" to Move Forward: S-1 Bifactor Models and the Study of Neurocognitive Abilities in Psychopathology.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- OneInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- It's Not That Great Anymore: The Central Role of Defense Mechanisms in Grandiose and Vulnerable Narcissism.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Burns et al. (this issue) have shown that the application of the symmetrical bifactor model to attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and oppositional defiant disorder (ODD) symptoms leads to anomalous and inconsistent results across different rater groups. In contrast to the symmetrical bifactor model, applications of the bifactor S-1 model showed consistent and theoretically well-founded results. The implications of the bifactor S-1 model for individual clinical assessment are discussed. It is shown that individual factor scores of the bifactor S-1 model reveal important information about the profile of individual symptoms that is not captured by factor scores of the multidimensional model with correlated first-order factors. It is argued that for individual clinical assessment factor scores from both types of model (multidimensional model with correlated first-order factors, bifactor S -1 model) should be estimated and compared. Finally, a general strategy for choosing an appropriate model for analyzing multi-faceted constructs is presented that compares areas of applications for (1) the multidimensional model with correlated first-order factors, (2) the bifactor S-1 model with a general reference factor, and (3) the bifactor S - 1 model with a directly assessed general factor.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.